Soundcard for a newbie


enriqueeeeee2001
 

 Hello,
Yesterday I tried in my computer a Winradio Excalibur that had been storaged for few years, it works fine with the PC's built-in soundcard, it really would help to use a more upmarket card.
It would get lower noise, more dynamic range, better stability and simply a more intelligible sound,which should translate into more DX. The same, of course, is true when using any SDR.
 
My question is that somebody can recommend a good internal or external soundcard since I am quite lost in this aspect. I do not mind to spend some extra money for this excellent receiver.

Any help and advice are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance


Max
 

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 09:57 PM, enriqueeeeee2001 wrote:
Yesterday I tried in my computer a Winradio Excalibur that had been storaged for few years, it works fine with the PC's built-in soundcard
AFAIK (unless there's something about this radio I have not understood) soundcard is nothing at all to do with performance of this radio if connected to SDR Console (this is the group for users of SDR Console software). 

It has USB 2.0 connector I believe (if it's the Excalibur G31DDC) so it's just delivering data to the PC via USB. Just connect to USB then install and run SDR Console. During the "Select Radio" dialogue, see attached picture to find the G31DDC dialogue to add the radio.

https://www.sdr-radio.com/download#Release

For guidance on actually using SDR Console, go to main website and hover above the top menu items for a catalogue of information on the features:

https://www.sdr-radio.com/

Come back here if further guidance needed.

Max


Conrad, PA5Y
 

Soundcard.

 

Behringer UMC202HD, rock solid drivers and cheap.

 

Luxury more expensive choice is the MOTU M4, nice metering, super low latency and rock solid drivers. Both work well as master outputs for Voice Meter Potato virtual sound (like VAC but better), which may be important.

 

73

 

Conrad PA5Y

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of enriqueeeeee2001 via groups.io
Sent: 09 January 2023 22:57
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: [SDR-Radio] Soundcard for a newbie

 

 Hello,
Yesterday I tried in my computer a Winradio Excalibur that had been storaged for few years, it works fine with the PC's built-in soundcard, it really would help to use a more upmarket card.
It would get lower noise, more dynamic range, better stability and simply a more intelligible sound,which should translate into more DX. The same, of course, is true when using any SDR.
 
My question is that somebody can recommend a good internal or external soundcard since I am quite lost in this aspect. I do not mind to spend some extra money for this excellent receiver.

Any help and advice are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance


Siegfried Jackstien
 

I do not think that you will hear anything more with a better soundcard... Its the sdr doing that job...
Making the audio hearable for you (driving speaker, headphone) any consumer soundcard.. Be it onboard or external, should do that job well.
Ok some onboard sc may have a dirty power rail or other noise on it... But that should be way lower as what comes from the sdr software as received audio. 
In an older laptop i had some hum noise on the sc (on input and output!)... Caused from the inverter for the backlight (on off switching to dim)... I cut the wire from motherboard to inverter that had an analog voltage to control the on off switching... Backlight now was brighter (running at 110% compared to old brightness)... And hum was gone.
After that modding that laptop was superclean on audio.
But that is many years ago in win 98 days ..
If an sdr sends iq to a soundcard (first sdr worked that way)... Then yes a good soundcard may help for a better receive.
On my actual laptop (hp zbook) i use the onboard sc for my mic audio and to drive the speaker in my wireless speakermike... And desktop speakers are connected to a 5 bucks usb soundcard.. The receiver (pluto for qo100 and airspy hf+ for shortwave) is what counts (and the software behind it!!!) .. Not the sc to drive your speaker..
Dg9bfc sigi 

Am 10.01.2023 11:22 schrieb "Conrad, PA5Y" <g0ruz@...>:

Soundcard.

 

Behringer UMC202HD, rock solid drivers and cheap.

 

Luxury more expensive choice is the MOTU M4, nice metering, super low latency and rock solid drivers. Both work well as master outputs for Voice Meter Potato virtual sound (like VAC but better), which may be important.

 

73

 

Conrad PA5Y

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of enriqueeeeee2001 via groups.io
Sent: 09 January 2023 22:57
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: [SDR-Radio] Soundcard for a newbie

 

 Hello,
Yesterday I tried in my computer a Winradio Excalibur that had been storaged for few years, it works fine with the PC's built-in soundcard, it really would help to use a more upmarket card.
It would get lower noise, more dynamic range, better stability and simply a more intelligible sound,which should translate into more DX. The same, of course, is true when using any SDR.
 
My question is that somebody can recommend a good internal or external soundcard since I am quite lost in this aspect. I do not mind to spend some extra money for this excellent receiver.

Any help and advice are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance



enriqueeeeee2001
 

Thanks for the avices,
It is a Winradio Excalibur G33DDCC the radio I ma using. Last night I could heard the same  weak stations, on my old analog receivers than with the Winradio, so I am a bit dissapointed. It is supposed to be the SDR much better in pulling out weak signals.
On the other hand I do not like the Winradio's interface at all I will have a try the sdr console instead.
I wish I had purchased an Airspy Discovery firstly. I will have a look at those external souncards, maybe an internal should be better I do not know.
Thnks for the help.


Simon Brown
 

A weak signal with no interference will be just as loud with almost any receiver as long as the receiver isn't overloaded by nearby strong signals. Winradio makes excellent radios.


From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of enriqueeeeee2001 via groups.io <enriqueeeeee2001@...>
Sent: 10 January 2023 13:37
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Soundcard for a newbie
 
Thanks for the avices,
It is a Winradio Excalibur G33DDCC the radio I ma using. Last night I could heard the same  weak stations, on my old analog receivers than with the Winradio, so I am a bit dissapointed. It is supposed to be the SDR much better in pulling out weak signals.
On the other hand I do not like the Winradio's interface at all I will have a try the sdr console instead.
I wish I had purchased an Airspy Discovery firstly. I will have a look at those external souncards, maybe an internal should be better I do not know.
Thnks for the help.

--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Max
 

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 01:37 PM, enriqueeeeee2001 wrote:
I wish I had purchased an Airspy Discovery firstly. I will have a look at those external souncards, maybe an internal should be better I do not know.
It's not the case that all SDRs will always be superior to a good quality analogue receiver. It's more the utility and usability that SDR gives you. For example, you cannot view a large section of HF spectrum in one go with an analogue receiver. Also(probaly most importantly) an SDR gives you access to superb digital filters in the software.

The soundcard makes no difference in this case. IMO, don't waste your money on that.

Regarding Airspy HF+, it only has a bandwidth of 768kHz so you can monitor more of the spectrum in one with the Winradio as I think the Winradio allows 2.5MHz? Also (more importantly) the Winradio is a direct sampling SDR whereas the HF+ has an analogue front end and mixer, which although excellent, is still susceptible to the vagaries of an analogue receiver.

I would personally stick with what you have as by all accounts (as Simon has said) it is an excellent radio (most likely better than the HF+). Just instal SDR Console as the software. You will not be disappointed.

73

Max


Curt Faulk
 

Enrique:

I also am using a WiNRADiO (but mine is a G31DDC) with SDR Console. I can attest that the WiNRADiO is an EXCELLENT receiver and works very with SDR Console. I also do not like the WiNRADiO software and much prefer SDR Console.

I also have several Airspy radios, HF+, HF+ Discovery among them. They are good, but I think the WiNRADiO is a bit better. I don't think you should be disappointed with your WiNRADiO.

I'm curious... what are you using for an antenna?


enriqueeeeee2001
 

Enrique:

I also am using a WiNRADiO (but mine is a G31DDC) with SDR Console. I can attest that the WiNRADiO is an EXCELLENT receiver and works very with SDR Console. I also do not like the WiNRADiO software and much prefer SDR Console.

I also have several Airspy radios, HF+, HF+ Discovery among them. They are good, but I think the WiNRADiO is a bit better. I don't think you should be disappointed with your WiNRADiO.
I'm curious... what are you using for an antenna
Thanks for the useful advices and recommendations!

  I have already decided that I will purchase an external USB soundcard I need it to give the extra output power for a 600 Ohms headphones.
 Last night tested the Winradio against a combo Lowe HF-150 /Datong FL-3 filter.  Much easier with the Lowe and the excellent Datong, signals clearer and the noise floor is lower; not tested with the AOR 7030 but I will.

Maybe I have to learn how the audio filter passband works, I spent almost two hours trying to listen a weak signal , however with Lowe in a minute could easily solve the situation.

 As a main antenna I use a Wellbrook ALA100M with an small rotator, I have a MFJ-1026 and several chokes/ferites across the coax line.


jdow
 

At HF you are limited by natural noise your antenna picks up in almost every case. (A small loop antenna with no preamp might be the exception. But a better front end noise figure would make small changes, again in most cases.

The sound card output can make huge differences if your psychology leans towards painting the outside rim of CDROMs with a green felt tip pen to get better sound quality. Otherwise it will make no practical difference.

SDRC used to listen to one frequency with no regard for its spectrum and waterfall display is a basic HF receiver with somewhat better filters and flexibility. Once you want to bring more of its features, multiple receivers for example, to the fore you can see some improvements. The digital noise reduction tools are also pretty good to amazing if you play with them and learn how to use them intelligently. But for basic sensitivity it's not going to change compared to a cheap receiver IF the receiver noise increases when you plug in the antenna. That is basic physics.

{^_^}

On 20230110 05:37:47, enriqueeeeee2001 via groups.io wrote:

Thanks for the avices,
It is a Winradio Excalibur G33DDCC the radio I ma using. Last night I could heard the same  weak stations, on my old analog receivers than with the Winradio, so I am a bit dissapointed. It is supposed to be the SDR much better in pulling out weak signals.
On the other hand I do not like the Winradio's interface at all I will have a try the sdr console instead.
I wish I had purchased an Airspy Discovery firstly. I will have a look at those external souncards, maybe an internal should be better I do not know.
Thnks for the help.


Max
 

Seconded on every single point.

Max


On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:28 PM, jdow wrote:

At HF you are limited by natural noise your antenna picks up in almost every case. (A small loop antenna with no preamp might be the exception. But a better front end noise figure would make small changes, again in most cases.

The sound card output can make huge differences if your psychology leans towards painting the outside rim of CDROMs with a green felt tip pen to get better sound quality. Otherwise it will make no practical difference.

SDRC used to listen to one frequency with no regard for its spectrum and waterfall display is a basic HF receiver with somewhat better filters and flexibility. Once you want to bring more of its features, multiple receivers for example, to the fore you can see some improvements. The digital noise reduction tools are also pretty good to amazing if you play with them and learn how to use them intelligently. But for basic sensitivity it's not going to change compared to a cheap receiver IF the receiver noise increases when you plug in the antenna. That is basic physics.