Dependency on Intel DLLs


Simon Brown
 

OpenCL is optionally used by Console, maybe that’s why.

 

There’s no need for Console to run on a FPGA – it needs some CPU and DirectX graphics. Things like the Intel 12th / 13th / 14th generation run programs like Console / SDR# etc. with ease. Console (and SDR#) is a very, very efficiently coded program.

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Gisle Vanem
Sent: 03 January 2022 10:19
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: [SDR-Radio] Dependency on Intel DLLs

 

I recently installed the Intel oneAPI with it's compiler etc. And a bunch of extra directories needed for PATH etc.

So now, running the latest SDR Console.exe beta-version, I noted via Process Explorer that some of these Intel .DLL files gets loaded into the SDR Console.exe process:

Process Explorer

How does this happen?

AFAICS, none of Simon's .DLLs/.EXEs loads these explicitly. So perhaps my Intel graphics driver of something else are loading these .DLLs dynamically?

Not at big problem. I'm just curious of what they do. Especially the AlteraCl.dll lib; SDR Console running on a FPGA. That'll be the day.


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Gisle Vanem
 

I recently installed the Intel oneAPI with it's compiler etc. And a bunch of extra directories needed for PATH etc.

So now, running the latest SDR Console.exe beta-version, I noted via Process Explorer that some of these Intel .DLL files gets loaded into the SDR Console.exe process:

Process Explorer

How does this happen?

AFAICS, none of Simon's .DLLs/.EXEs loads these explicitly. So perhaps my Intel graphics driver of something else are loading these .DLLs dynamically?

Not at big problem. I'm just curious of what they do. Especially the AlteraCl.dll lib; SDR Console running on a FPGA. That'll be the day.