HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?
Siegfried Jackstien
i have an easy thing for you :-) you can "delete" tx voice keyer from your todo list https://www.sdr-radio.com/Future ... cause we now have one (that works quite well!!) greetz sigi dg9bfc Am 14.08.2021 um 07:22 schrieb Simon
Brown:
|
|
Simon Brown
Indeed,
Pluto alone is the way to go. I’ll be 64 soon, no more mayor software headaches please – brain can’t handle it 😊 .
Simon Brown, G4ELI
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Siegfried Jackstien
Sent: 13 August 2021 21:54 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?
yes maybe youz could start sdrc 2 times and marriage them via virtual comporst and commander but in my view its much easier to just use the pluto alone dg9bfc sigi Am 13.08.2021 um 21:24 schrieb jdow:
-- - + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.
|
|
Siegfried Jackstien
yes maybe youz could start sdrc 2 times and marriage them via virtual comporst and commander but in my view its much easier to just use the pluto alone dg9bfc sigi Am 13.08.2021 um 21:24 schrieb jdow:
At present you need to make two instances of SDR Console cooperate with each other. I believe this has been done serial interface.
|
|
jdow
Still, I am afraid Simon will follow thinking a
little like mine. While a tool like SDRC can be designed from the
bottom up without presumptions of "same clock" and the like,
changing an existing design is probably not in the cards.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
{^_^}
On 20210813 11:49:33,
dietrich@... wrote:
Out of stock... The TCXOs are not easy to get. Hackrf ist very stabile...
|
|
jdow
At present you need to make two instances of SDR
Console cooperate with each other. I believe this has been done
serial interface.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
A few minutes of thought suggest it is technically possible to crank the design of something like SDRConsole around to allow different RX and TX conversion stages (front end/back end respectively.) I am not sure that it is technically feasible without a design contemplating this from the very beginning. It breaks just a whole LOT of normal starting conditions for the design of an existing tool. I'm afraid you are stuck with the hard way in the first paragraph above. {^_^}
|
|
dietrich@...
Out of stock... The TCXOs are not easy to get. Hackrf ist very stabile...
|
|
dietrich@...
Same when I want to use 2 HackRFs
|
|
Siegfried Jackstien
use the pluto for rx and tx either install a better tcxo inside or use external reference dg9bfc sigi Am 13.08.2021 um 19:41 schrieb
dietrich@...:
For stability reasond I'd like to run like this. But how?
|
|
dietrich@...
For stability reasond I'd like to run like this. But how?
|
|