You are trying to route an address that is not meant to be routed. It would have to be explicitly routed. And that may not work. {^_^}

There are two ways to route from 192.168.2.xxx to 192.168.3.1. One is set netmask to 255.255.254.0, 1111111 11111111 11111110 00000000. Then when a boolean "and" on the netmask and the addresses at bo

255.255.255.0, or 1111111 1111111 11111111 00000000 in binary, means that in terms of addresses 192.168.3.10 is on a different "network" (for routing purposes) than 192.168.2.10. Addresses for that fi

Some SDRs may load the system differently than others. And it's REALLY difficult to sort that out. SDRs are not really well suited to multi-threading, a usual technique to offload processors. SDRC wit

So did you basically rewrite MFC to do this or just the owner draw features of the GUI? {^_^}

He might also check if the GPU is heavily throttling in a notebook configuration. {o.o}

#sdrconsolev3

The ideal answer is each front end requires one PPM value that each SDR software must explicitly load into the front end each time it is run. This PPM value should then be good at all frequencies the

Should have said "through" instead of around. {o.o}

If he does not stop microweb.hu from spamming me with bounces microweb.hu will permanently as in forever will be trimmed off my email stream and not even placed into my spam bucket. {+_+}

Good point. Wrap antenna feed or USB feed several times around a 3/4" clamp on bead with the suggested foil wrap. If that works even minor miracles make it permanent. If not you've saved yourself some

There is a very basic point regarding ground to get straight before you go further. Ground is not ground. It is NOT what comes to your mind unbidden. It is not a giant unipotential plane of unobtainiu

Set netmask properly on the Pluto if what you describe is not intentional. We do not care to "share" video of our property over the network to a cloud server. So all the cameras are on a portion of th

I think it something more like this (sung as a dirge): Happy Birthday, unh! Happy Birthday, unh! Now that you're the age you are Death cannot be off too far Happy Birthday, unh! Happy Birthday, unh! D

I have a $1000 gold plated wall socket that might make your system sound better if you have special wooden knobs to avoid vibration effects.... {O,o}

Anybody who thinks they can hear better audio at 192 ksps than 96 ksps is kidding themselves. Anybody who says they can hear a difference between 48 ksps and 96 ksps is most likely kidding themselves

That IS the first address, http rather than emai to be honest, in your signature. It seems "obvious" to "assume" you have an email account at g4eli.com perhaps g4eli@... or simon@.... Or p

2097152 would be the real bit-head choice not that it would be accurate 1 Hz steps in any case. {^_-}

I realized this. I believe the very first users selected the set of sample rates you see. In reality there are ranges of numbers that will work. One starts at 900001 samples per second up to 3200000 s

... who is probably not here. {^_^}

Utterly arbitrary coupled with "tradition". {^_^}