Perhaps designed for wood and not think alumin(i)um. {O.O}

I and Q each have only 10 bits resolution? Meh. {o.o}

#sdrserver

For reference a fully 1 GIB Ethernet link might make it to about 25 Msps if there was absolutely no other traffic on the link. If it goes wireless anywhere 8 Msps could very well be right up at the li

#sdrserver

Fewer aliases right around the boundaries of adjacent recordings comes to mind. {o.o}

I suspect that if you check it out Simon's 2.8 kHz filter is narrower than a conventional crystal filter's 2.7 kHz even at 30 dB down. {^_^}

Agreed - and stubborn, too. {^_-}

Sigi = SDRSharp does this, too. SDRC is what happens when SDRSharp grows up and sheds it the GUI library it's using. {^_-}

When bands overlap it would be nice to be able to create horizontal color bands with the primary class on top working down to ISM uses on the bottom. (Warning - snob snarky statement) Any ham who need

Your first mistake was deleting HDSDR. It has nothing to do with SDRSharp. The second mistake was deleting SDRSharp. You do not have to. You can have several SDRSharp's installed, each in its own fold

#sdrsharp

And young enough he had the chance to learn software as a mother tongue. {^_-}

Yup, I earned every one of these gray hairs the hard way - by living long enough. (And by doing the opposite of what politicians told me to do? I met Willy Ley. I met a Gulag survivor. I had a profess

(And for the record, I did hear Sputnik on the school's radio club radio.) {o.o}

Please - it's ALL Simon, really. He is the guilty party in this endeavor. I'm just an over educated gadfly on the sidelines. And, indeed, SDRC is so fantastic it's hard to believe looking at it from a

Ba-da-bing as they say in the vernacular. {o.o} (Besides, EVERYTHING is "just physics". So it was sort of a null statement. OTOH, in general lowering levels keeps you out of the non-linear regions or

Voltage variable attenuators also have IMD. Are you measuring right at the output of the attenuator or is there a buffer on chip? It will also affect the cross coupling within the chip between the out

The alternative was a college level lecture that I (fortunately?) do not feel up to delivering today. {^_-}

Physics, plain pure old fashioned physics. {^_^}

I'll believe that. But it was possible that the USB 3 port controller was in some data contention issues. RX888 going full speed would prove that. That's why I asked. {^_^}

#sdrconsolev3 #ettus

That REALLY REALLY sounds like a firewall issue. Is your wireless network behind a NAT firewall of its own? (That is a nice secure way to handle it.) {^_^}

Mumble mumble.... USB 3,0 was supposed to be about 500 MBps (BYTE/s). So it should support, just barely, a sample rate of 125 Msps for 16 bit I/Q samples. Is that 24 MHz a limit only for B200 or for R

#sdrconsolev3 #ettus