|
Paul, This I can support via the serial port, in fact it's something I do have on my list. Via the remote computer I can control serial and parallel ports and the port on the radio. Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of pd0psb@... Since the Net-sdr has converter switching capabilities, does it also offer remote antenna switching?
|
|
|
Re: b472 waterfall speed does not change + ...
Hi, I got to the bottom of this last night, there will be a kit in a day or two. An important change with RC1 is replacing speed with resolution, higher resolution = slower updates due to the laws of mathematics etc. What you have found is a bug in sending the resolution info to the server. Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of ic8pof GE again.
Just tried server b416 and console b472, but no difference in the Waterfall speed via remote-lan.
Always SLOW.
|
|
|
What he said: We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like: · diversity reception, · adaptive polarity, · triangulation, · direction finding · etc. using multiple radios. Taking SDR to a new level. Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of RFSPACE The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing before we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers. It will be offered with a reference lock option as well as internal downconverters for VHF. I will be shipping one to Simon next week so he can start testing with it. It uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so it already works with SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14 that has been discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction finding etc using multiple radios. There are a few other features that we cannot announce yet, but it will be very exciting.
|
|
|
Great news Pieter, it's going to be a dream machine.
Since the Net-sdr has converter switching capabilities, does it also offer remote antenna switching?
If not, will this at some stage being considered?
73
Paul
PD0PSB
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In sdr-radio-com@..., "RFSPACE" <rfspace@...> wrote:
Mark,
Of course. Everyting runs synchronous to the 80 MHz clock. There will be two reflock options. One has -155 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz and one has -171 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz. The unlocked stability will also be different.
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark (G4PCS)
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [sdr-radio-com] NetSDR coming soon.
Hi Pieter,
will the LO for the "internal downconverters for VHF" also be locked to the reference, if that option is fitted?
Regards, Mark
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: RFSPACE <rfspace@...>
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Sent: Saturday, 13 November, 2010 23:08:36
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] NetSDR coming soon.
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing before we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers. It will be offered with a reference lock option as well as internal downconverters for VHF. I will be shipping one to Simon next week so he can start testing with it. It uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so it already works with SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14 that has been discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction finding etc using multiple radios. There are a few other features that we cannot announce yet, but it will be very exciting.
Best 73s
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 6:00 PM
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re: Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-)
The Net SDR..............is that basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If not, then could you point me in a good direction???
73's
Steve/KC8LQV
--- In sdr-radio-com@..., "Simon HB9DRV" <simon@> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really is that good.
>
>
>
> All the docking panes (AF Spectrum, Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float
> - drag them to another monitor :) You could drag the AF Spectrum to another
> monitor & make it as big as you want but it can use more CPU cycles to do
> the graphics.
>
>
>
> I am actually working on a User manual, at least I've found a template and
> have Office / Word 2007 installed.
>
>
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
>
> (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
>
>
>
> From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
> On Behalf Of Steve
> Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44
> To: sdr-radio-com@...
> Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> My question is what particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to use
> the software??? I am just following the process currently of it's
> development. I am assuming a RF Space SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also, is
> the SDR-14 being done away with???
>
> My suggestion (and it might be already on the table) is, like HRD, be able
> to use multiple monitors with the software. Like to be able to run the
> waterfall on one screen while observing the RF on another. Or even the
> filter width to adjust it.
>
> As I said, it is just a suggestion. I know you will be working on this for a
> long time. I am thankful for your work. :-)
>
> Thank you Simon
>
> Steve/KC8LQV
>
|
|
|
Mark,
Of course. Everyting runs synchronous to the 80 MHz
clock. There will be two reflock options. One has -155 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz and one
has -171 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz. The unlocked stability will also be
different.
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 7:48
PM
Subject: Re: [sdr-radio-com] NetSDR
coming soon.
Hi Pieter,
will the LO for the "internal downconverters for VHF"
also be locked to the reference, if that option is fitted?
Regards,
Mark
From: RFSPACE <rfspace@...>
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Sent: Saturday, 13 November, 2010
23:08:36
Subject:
[sdr-radio-com] NetSDR coming soon.
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The
radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing
before we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to the top
performers. It will be offered with a reference lock option as well as
internal downconverters for VHF. I will be shipping one to Simon next week so
he can start testing with it. It uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so
it already works with SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14
that has been discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio
like diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction finding
etc using multiple radios. There are a few other features that we cannot
announce yet, but it will be very exciting.
Best 73s
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 6:00
PM
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re:
Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-)
The Net SDR..............is that
basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet???
If not, then could you point me in a good direction???
73's
Steve/KC8LQV
--- In sdr-radio-com@...,
"Simon HB9DRV" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really is that
good.
>
>
>
> All the docking panes (AF Spectrum,
Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float
> - drag them to another
monitor :) You could drag the AF Spectrum to another
> monitor &
make it as big as you want but it can use more CPU cycles to do
> the
graphics.
>
>
>
> I am actually working on a User
manual, at least I've found a template and
> have Office / Word 2007
installed.
>
>
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
>
> (All E-mail verified
to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
>
>
>
>
From: sdr-radio-com@...
[mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
>
On Behalf Of Steve
> Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44
> To: sdr-radio-com@...
>
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> My question is what
particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to use
> the
software??? I am just following the process currently of it's
>
development. I am assuming a RF Space SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also,
is
> the SDR-14 being done away with???
>
> My suggestion
(and it might be already on the table) is, like HRD, be able
> to use
multiple monitors with the software. Like to be able to run the
>
waterfall on one screen while observing the RF on another. Or even
the
> filter width to adjust it.
>
> As I said, it is
just a suggestion. I know you will be working on this for a
> long
time. I am thankful for your work. :-)
>
> Thank you
Simon
>
>
Steve/KC8LQV
>
|
|
|
Mark \(G4PCS\) <g4pcs@...>
Hi Pieter,
will the LO for the "internal downconverters for VHF" also be locked to the reference, if that option is fitted?
Regards, Mark
From: RFSPACE
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Sent: Saturday, 13 November, 2010 23:08:36
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] NetSDR coming
soon.
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The
radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing before
we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers.
It will be offered with a reference lock option as well as internal
downconverters for VHF. I will be shipping one to Simon next week so he can
start testing with it. It uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so it
already works with SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14 that
has been discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like
diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction finding etc
using multiple radios. There are a few other features that we cannot announce
yet, but it will be very exciting.
Best 73s
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 6:00
PM
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re:
Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-)
The Net SDR..............is that
basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If
not, then could you point me in a good direction???
73's
Steve/KC8LQV
--- In sdr-radio-com@...,
"Simon HB9DRV" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really is that
good.
>
>
>
> All the docking panes (AF Spectrum,
Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float
> - drag them to another monitor
:) You could drag the AF Spectrum to another
> monitor & make it as
big as you want but it can use more CPU cycles to do
> the
graphics.
>
>
>
> I am actually working on a User
manual, at least I've found a template and
> have Office / Word 2007
installed.
>
>
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
>
> (All
E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
>
>
>
> From: sdr-radio-com@...
[mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
>
On Behalf Of Steve
> Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44
> To: sdr-radio-com@...
>
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> My question is what
particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to use
> the software???
I am just following the process currently of it's
> development. I am
assuming a RF Space SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also, is
> the SDR-14
being done away with???
>
> My suggestion (and it might be
already on the table) is, like HRD, be able
> to use multiple monitors
with the software. Like to be able to run the
> waterfall on one screen
while observing the RF on another. Or even the
> filter width to adjust
it.
>
> As I said, it is just a suggestion. I know you will be
working on this for a
> long time. I am thankful for your work.
:-)
>
> Thank you Simon
>
>
Steve/KC8LQV
>
|
|
|
Re: Spectravue generated files - UTC displayed correctly? (Build 472) [1 Attachment]
Mark \(G4PCS\) <g4pcs@...>
Hi Simon,
image attached showing both console and SV dialogs with info for the same file... shows one hour difference in UTC start time. Very strange.
Regards, Mark
From: Simon HB9DRV
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Sent: Saturday, 13 November, 2010 22:12:46
Subject: RE:
[sdr-radio-com] Spectravue generated files - UTC displayed correctly? (Build 472) [1 Attachment]
Hi, Look in the Statistics tab in the Play IQ Data File pane and let me know the Source value, something line SpectraVue 3.0. (See attached screenshot.) There is a bug in versions of SV prior to 3.0 which is difficult and sometimes impossible to correct. From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of Mark (G4PCS)
Sent: 12 November 2010 14:18
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Cc: simon@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Spectravue generated files - UTC displayed correctly? (Build 472) Hi Simon,
I notice I get an hour discrepancy in the time displayed whilst playing files that were recorded by Spectravue during British Summer Time. For example, playing a particular file in Spectravue displays the time as (24/05/10) 14:50z, and the same point in the same file is displayed in SDR-Console as (24/05/10) 15:50z. I'm pretty certain the Spectravue time is correct; I wonder if it stores a UTC offset in the file header separately to the time, that isn't picked up by the console?
Dotting the i's and crossing the t's, the console is damn good :D
Regards,
Mark EI3KD / G4PCS
|
|
|
Joe,
The NetSDR and SDR-IP are both superior and more expensive than the SDR-IQ. We have optimized the sensitivity, 2nd and 3rd order intermod, phase noise and front end filtering. In addition, both SpectraVue and SDR-Radio have new decimation/NCO cores that are highly optimized. The NetSDR is not meant to replace the SDR-IQ since it is at a higher price point.
Best 73s,
Pieter
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Joseph Mettee <moejet@...> wrote:
Pieter,
With regard to your statement. "The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers"
Does that mean you consider the Net SDR to be superior to the SDR-IQ?
Thanks for your reply,
Joe - KB1SSA --- On Sat, 11/13/10, RFSPACE <rfspace@...> wrote:
From: RFSPACE <rfspace@...>
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] NetSDR coming soon.Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010, 6:08 PM
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing before we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers. It will be offered with a reference lock option as well as internal downconverters for VHF. I will be shipping one to Simon next week so he can start testing with it. It uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so it already works with SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14 that has been discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction finding etc using multiple radios. There are a few other features that we cannot announce yet, but it will be very exciting.
Best 73s
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 6:00 PM
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re: Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-) The Net SDR..............is that basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If not, then could you point me in a good direction??? 73's
Steve/KC8LQV --- In sdr-radio-com@..., "Simon HB9DRV" <simon@...> wrote:
> > Hi, > > > > The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really is that good. > > > > All the docking panes (AF Spectrum, Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float
> - drag them to another monitor :) You could drag the AF Spectrum to another > monitor & make it as big as you want but it can use more CPU cycles to do > the graphics. > > > > I am actually working on a User
manual, at least I've found a template and > have Office / Word 2007 installed. > > > > Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
> > (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant) > > > > From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto: sdr-radio-com@...]
> On Behalf Of Steve > Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44 > To: sdr-radio-com@...
> Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion > > > > > > Hello > > My question is what particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to use > the software??? I am just following the process currently of it's
> development. I am assuming a RF Space SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also, is > the SDR-14 being done away with??? > > My suggestion (and it might be already on the table) is, like HRD, be able > to use multiple monitors with the software. Like to be able to run the
> waterfall on one screen while observing the RF on another. Or even the > filter width to adjust it. > > As I said, it is just a suggestion. I know you will be working on this for a > long time. I am thankful for your work. :-)
> > Thank you Simon > >
Steve/KC8LQV >
|
|
|
|
Joe,
It will be in the same league or better than the
Perseus SDR and Flex 1,2,3...5000.
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 6:26
PM
Subject: Re: [sdr-radio-com] NetSDR
coming soon.
|
Pieter,
With regard to your statement. "The performance is phenomenal
compared to the top performers"
Does that mean you consider the Net SDR to be superior to the
SDR-IQ?
Thanks for your reply,
Joe - KB1SSA --- On Sat, 11/13/10, RFSPACE <rfspace@...>
wrote:
From:
RFSPACE <rfspace@...>
Subject:
[sdr-radio-com] NetSDR coming soon.
To:
sdr-radio-com@...
Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010,
6:08 PM
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of
USB. The radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and
CE testing before we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal
compared to the top performers. It will be offered with a reference
lock option as well as internal downconverters for VHF. I will be
shipping one to Simon next week so he can start testing with it. It
uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so it already works with
SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14 that has been
discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like
diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction
finding etc using multiple radios. There are a few other features that
we cannot announce yet, but it will be very exciting.
Best 73s
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13,
2010 6:00 PM
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re:
Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-) The Net
SDR..............is that basically internet based???? If so, can it
operate outside the internet??? If not, then could you point me in a
good direction??? 73's Steve/KC8LQV --- In sdr-radio-com@...,
"Simon HB9DRV" wrote: > > Hi, >
> > > The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really
is that good. > > > > All the docking
panes (AF Spectrum, Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float >
- drag them to another monitor :) You could drag the AF Spectrum to
another > monitor & make it as big as you want but it can
use more CPU cycles to do > the graphics. > >
> > I am actually working on a User manual, at least
I've found a template and > have Office / Word 2007
installed. > > > > Simon Brown, HB9DRV,
http://sdr-radio.com> > (All E-mail
verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant) > >
> > From: sdr-radio-com@...
[mailto: sdr-radio-com@...] >
On Behalf Of Steve > Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44 > To:
sdr-radio-com@...>
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion > >
> > > > Hello > > My
question is what particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to
use > the software??? I am just following the process
currently of it's > development. I am assuming a RF Space
SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also, is > the SDR-14 being done
away with??? > > My suggestion (and it might be already
on the table) is, like HRD, be able > to use multiple monitors
with the software. Like to be able to run the > waterfall on
one screen while observing the RF on another. Or even the >
filter width to adjust it. > > As I said, it is just a
suggestion. I know you will be working on this for a > long
time. I am thankful for your work. :-) > > Thank you
Simon > >
Steve/KC8LQV >
|
|
|
|
Pieter,
With regard to your statement. "The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers"
Does that mean you consider the Net SDR to be superior to the SDR-IQ?
Thanks for your reply,
Joe - KB1SSA
|
--- On Sat, 11/13/10, RFSPACE wrote:
From: RFSPACE
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] NetSDR coming soon.
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010, 6:08 PM
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing before we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers. It will be offered with a reference lock option as well as internal downconverters for VHF. I will be shipping one to Simon next week so he can start testing with it. It uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so it already works with SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14 that has been discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction finding etc using multiple radios. There are a few other features that we cannot announce yet, but it will be very exciting.
Best 73s
Pieter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 6:00 PM
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re: Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-) The Net SDR..............is that basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If not, then could you point me in a good direction??? 73's Steve/KC8LQV --- In sdr-radio-com@..., "Simon HB9DRV" wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really is that good. > > > > All the docking panes (AF Spectrum, Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float > - drag them to another monitor :) You could drag the AF Spectrum to another > monitor & make it as big as you want but it can use more CPU cycles to do > the graphics. > > > > I am actually working on a User
manual, at least I've found a template and > have Office / Word 2007 installed. > > > > Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com> > (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant) > > > > From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto: sdr-radio-com@...] > On Behalf Of Steve > Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44 > To: sdr-radio-com@...> Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion > > > > > > Hello > > My question is what particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to use > the software??? I am just following the process currently of it's > development. I am assuming a RF Space SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also, is > the SDR-14 being done away with??? > > My suggestion (and it might be already on the table) is, like HRD, be able > to use multiple monitors with the software. Like to be able to run the > waterfall on one screen while observing the RF on another. Or even the > filter width to adjust it. > > As I said, it is just a suggestion. I know you will be working on this for a > long time. I am thankful for your work. :-) > > Thank you Simon > >
Steve/KC8LQV >
|
|
|
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The
radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing before
we start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers.
It will be offered with a reference lock option as well as internal
downconverters for VHF. I will be shipping one to Simon next week so he can
start testing with it. It uses the same exact protocol as the SDR-IP so it
already works with SDR-Radio. It will be priced slightly above the SDR-14 that
has been discontinued. We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like
diversity reception, adaptive polarity, triangulation, direction finding etc
using multiple radios. There are a few other features that we cannot announce
yet, but it will be very exciting.
Best 73s
Pieter
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 6:00
PM
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re:
Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-)
The Net SDR..............is that
basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If
not, then could you point me in a good direction???
73's
Steve/KC8LQV
--- In sdr-radio-com@...,
"Simon HB9DRV" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really is that
good.
>
>
>
> All the docking panes (AF Spectrum,
Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float
> - drag them to another monitor
:) You could drag the AF Spectrum to another
> monitor & make it as
big as you want but it can use more CPU cycles to do
> the
graphics.
>
>
>
> I am actually working on a User
manual, at least I've found a template and
> have Office / Word 2007
installed.
>
>
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
>
> (All
E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
>
>
>
> From: sdr-radio-com@...
[mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
>
On Behalf Of Steve
> Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44
> To: sdr-radio-com@...
>
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> My question is what
particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to use
> the software???
I am just following the process currently of it's
> development. I am
assuming a RF Space SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also, is
> the SDR-14
being done away with???
>
> My suggestion (and it might be
already on the table) is, like HRD, be able
> to use multiple monitors
with the software. Like to be able to run the
> waterfall on one screen
while observing the RF on another. Or even the
> filter width to adjust
it.
>
> As I said, it is just a suggestion. I know you will be
working on this for a
> long time. I am thankful for your work.
:-)
>
> Thank you Simon
>
>
Steve/KC8LQV
>
|
|
|
Thanks Simon for the reply :-)
The Net SDR..............is that basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If not, then could you point me in a good direction???
73's
Steve/KC8LQV
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In sdr-radio-com@..., "Simon HB9DRV" <simon@...> wrote:
Hi,
The NetSDR will blow your mind, it really is that good.
All the docking panes (AF Spectrum, Data Decoder, Grey Line etc.) can float
- drag them to another monitor :) You could drag the AF Spectrum to another
monitor & make it as big as you want but it can use more CPU cycles to do
the graphics.
I am actually working on a User manual, at least I've found a template and
have Office / Word 2007 installed.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
(All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: 13 November 2010 18:44
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Question/Suggestion
Hello
My question is what particular SDR receiver should I get to be able to use
the software??? I am just following the process currently of it's
development. I am assuming a RF Space SDR-IQ or the new Net-SDR. Also, is
the SDR-14 being done away with???
My suggestion (and it might be already on the table) is, like HRD, be able
to use multiple monitors with the software. Like to be able to run the
waterfall on one screen while observing the RF on another. Or even the
filter width to adjust it.
As I said, it is just a suggestion. I know you will be working on this for a
long time. I am thankful for your work. :-)
Thank you Simon
Steve/KC8LQV
|
|
|
Re: SDR-Radio Server requested feature
I've actually thought about a proper chat facility between the client & server, just haven't had time to add this. Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant) From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of ic8pof GE, a mini one-way text remainder from the server owner to the client Console in which to write anything maybe " if u dont tune correctly ssb I will cut the ... line " etc etc.
|
|
|
Re: Spectravue generated files - UTC displayed correctly? (Build 472)
Hi, Look in the Statistics tab in the Play IQ Data File pane and let me know the Source value, something line SpectraVue 3.0. (See attached screenshot.) There is a bug in versions of SV prior to 3.0 which is difficult and sometimes impossible to correct. Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of Mark (G4PCS)
Sent: 12 November 2010 14:18
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Cc: simon@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Spectravue generated files - UTC displayed correctly? (Build 472) Hi Simon,
I notice I get an hour discrepancy in the time displayed whilst playing files that were recorded by Spectravue during British Summer Time. For example, playing a particular file in Spectravue displays the time as (24/05/10) 14:50z, and the same point in the same file is displayed in SDR-Console as (24/05/10) 15:50z. I'm pretty certain the Spectravue time is correct; I wonder if it stores a UTC offset in the file header separately to the time, that isn't picked up by the console?
Dotting the i's and crossing the t's, the console is damn good :D
Regards,
Mark EI3KD / G4PCS
|
|
|
Re: SDR-Radio Server requested feature
GE, a mini one-way text remainder from the server owner to the client Console in which to write anything maybe " if u dont tune correctly ssb I will cut the ... line " etc etc.
73
Phil#IC8POF
- In sdr-radio-com@..., "Simon HB9DRV" <simon@...> wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi,
Let me think about this - I can do it of course...
Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
(All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
On Behalf Of baj4242
Sent: 13 November 2010 22:31
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] SDR-Radio Server requested feature
Hi Simon,
Now that 472 is out, I have a request. Can you add a feature to the remote
server that would allow the local owner to also have control of the
frequency setting?
I find that in many cases the remote operator using my SDR-IQ will tune an
SSB station off-frequency and leave it there for the duration of the
connection (sometimes up to an hour). Donald Duck audio is fine for a
cartoon, but not for SDR reception.
Thanks.
Barry WB2ZXJ
|
|
|
Re: Play IQ Data file - waterfall timestamp error after time-skipping (Build 472)
And it's fixed :) Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant) From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of Simon HB9DRV Confirmed as a bug - it just took me two hours. Will now get this fixed.
|
|
|
Re: SDR-Radio Server requested feature
Hi, Let me think about this - I can do it of course... Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of baj4242
Sent: 13 November 2010 22:31
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] SDR-Radio Server requested feature Hi Simon,
Now that 472 is out, I have a request. Can you add a feature to the remote server that would allow the local owner to also have control of the frequency setting?
I find that in many cases the remote operator using my SDR-IQ will tune an SSB station off-frequency and leave it there for the duration of the connection (sometimes up to an hour). Donald Duck audio is fine for a cartoon, but not for SDR reception.
Thanks.
Barry WB2ZXJ
|
|
|
Re: Play IQ Data file - waterfall timestamp error after time-skipping (Build 472)
Hi, Confirmed as a bug - it just took me two hours. Will now get this fixed. Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of Mark (G4PCS)
Sent: 12 November 2010 10:56
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Cc: simon@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Play IQ Data file - waterfall timestamp error after time-skipping (Build 472) Hi Simon,
"Time navigation" using any of the relevant controls when playing a data file works fine, but I noticed that the time-lines on the waterfall (if selected) don't get updated correctly after skipping. Effectively, they seem to be reset to the start time of the recording, no matter where in the file one has navigated to.
Regards,
Mark EI3KD / G4PCS
|
|
|
Re: b472 waterfall speed does not change + ...
GE again.
Just tried server b416 and console b472, but no difference in the Waterfall speed via remote-lan.
Always SLOW.
Remember b416 WF speed is OK.
73
Phil@IC8POF
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In sdr-radio-com@..., "Simon HB9DRV" <simon@...> wrote:
Hi,
I'll fix the remote server issue.
I'll look at this main issue - seems odd as it's OK here.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
(All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
On Behalf Of ic8pof
Sent: 13 November 2010 20:01
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re: b472 waterfall speed does not change + ...
GE Simon.
Ja, I use SDR_IQ in a remote config on a second pc2 via a lan-switch as my
main pc1 is used for logging\contesting\groups-reading etc etc.
Viewing on the pc1 screen (enlarged desktop over 2 monitors with 2 video
output VGA+DVI).
In the B416Console the speed control works also in remote.
here is the screen-pic:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdr-radio-com/photos/album/1050649225/pic/3425
45962/view?picmode=
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdr-radio-com/photos/album/1050649225/pic/342
545962/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc>
&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc
About the main window memory : when a window is closed and then reopened ,
it stays where it was before.
B472 main window no.
As you see in the attached screen-shot the Console stays on the left side (
enlarged desktop on a second monitor) with AFSpectrum and RXOptions.
Now I switch OFF and reopen and the main window does not open on the left
but on the right side of the desktop.
AFSpectrum,RXOptions and Remote connection windows stay on the left as
before.
All that works OK in the B416 Console.
73
Phil@IC8POF
--- In sdr-radio-com@...
<mailto:sdr-radio-com%40yahoogroups.com> , "Simon HB9DRV" <simon@> wrote:
Hi,
Probably stays slow using a remote radio but should be OK with a local
connection, maybe post a screenshot?
And what do you mean by memory Position? Maybe another screenshot please,
then I can fix this :)
Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
(All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
From: sdr-radio-com@...
<mailto:sdr-radio-com%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:sdr-radio-com@...
<mailto:sdr-radio-com%40yahoogroups.com> ]
On Behalf Of ic8pof
Sent: 13 November 2010 18:21
To: sdr-radio-com@... <mailto:sdr-radio-com%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: [sdr-radio-com] b472 waterfall speed does not change + ...
HI Simon, just put into work the b472.
I am not able to change the speed of the WF it is fixed on a SLOW even if it
is set to maximum. The Contrast works.
I have RESETted but nothing happens.
Also the memory position on Console EXIT of the main window is not retained.
So when the Console is reopened , the main window stays at the centre of
the
desktop and AFSpectrum,RXOptions and the Remote connecting windows stay
where I usually have.
All OK on the old b416
73
Phil@IC8POF
|
|
|
Re: b472 waterfall speed does not change + ...
Hi, I'll fix the remote server issue. I'll look at this main issue - seems odd as it's OK here. Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...] On Behalf Of ic8pof
Sent: 13 November 2010 20:01
To: sdr-radio-com@...
Subject: [sdr-radio-com] Re: b472 waterfall speed does not change + ... GE Simon.
Ja, I use SDR_IQ in a remote config on a second pc2 via a lan-switch as my main pc1 is used for logging\contesting\groups-reading etc etc.
Viewing on the pc1 screen (enlarged desktop over 2 monitors with 2 video output VGA+DVI).
In the B416Console the speed control works also in remote.
here is the screen-pic: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdr-radio-com/photos/album/1050649225/pic/342545962/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc
About the main window memory : when a window is closed and then reopened , it stays where it was before.
B472 main window no.
As you see in the attached screen-shot the Console stays on the left side ( enlarged desktop on a second monitor) with AFSpectrum and RXOptions.
Now I switch OFF and reopen and the main window does not open on the left but on the right side of the desktop.
AFSpectrum,RXOptions and Remote connection windows stay on the left as before.
All that works OK in the B416 Console.
73
Phil@IC8POF
--- In sdr-radio-com@..., "Simon HB9DRV" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Probably stays slow using a remote radio but should be OK with a local
> connection, maybe post a screenshot?
>
>
>
> And what do you mean by memory Position? Maybe another screenshot please,
> then I can fix this :)
>
>
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
>
> (All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and RFC2549 compliant)
>
>
>
> From: sdr-radio-com@... [mailto:sdr-radio-com@...]
> On Behalf Of ic8pof
> Sent: 13 November 2010 18:21
> To: sdr-radio-com@...
> Subject: [sdr-radio-com] b472 waterfall speed does not change + ...
>
>
>
>
>
> HI Simon, just put into work the b472.
> I am not able to change the speed of the WF it is fixed on a SLOW even if it
> is set to maximum. The Contrast works.
> I have RESETted but nothing happens.
>
> Also the memory position on Console EXIT of the main window is not retained.
>
> So when the Console is reopened , the main window stays at the centre of the
> desktop and AFSpectrum,RXOptions and the Remote connecting windows stay
> where I usually have.
>
> All OK on the old b416
>
> 73
> Phil@IC8POF
>
|
|
|
