Date   

Re: CW Offset

Carl Moreschi <n4py3@...>
 

No. I'm just saying how my software solves this as a suggestion to Simon. It's how to code this situation.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:29 AM, Paul Christensen wrote:
Carl,

Perhaps you can reply with an example of your filter setting and I'll try that as an interim solution. Thanks!

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Carl Moreschi
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:25 AM
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

No. The filter is adjusted so that it goes from zero to the hi end but not centered on the signal. The normal thing would be for the filter to go below zero if it is centered on the signal but that's not at all desirable. So I just move the filter so it starts at zero and is no longer centered on the signal just like you had used PBT to do it.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:20 AM, Paul Christensen wrote:
Carl,

But then doesn't the true frequency display shift by the amount of the offset? I suppose that's a temporary fix but certainly an annoyance.

Paul, W9AC

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Carl Moreschi
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:11 AM
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

What I do is once the BW exceed 2 times the sidetone, I just put the signal at the sidetone offset rather than the BW center.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:04 AM, Simon Brown wrote:
Max,

At the moment it would require some brain power to enable what's wanted. I'll think about this, but at the moment it's safest no to bodge the code.

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com


-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Max Mucci, N5NHJ via Groups.Io
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:50
To: Paul Christensen<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency. As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases. CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a
2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency. There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone.
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
Paul, W9AC

















Re: CW Offset

Paul Christensen <w9ac@...>
 

Carl,

Perhaps you can reply with an example of your filter setting and I'll try that as an interim solution. Thanks!

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Carl Moreschi
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:25 AM
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

No. The filter is adjusted so that it goes from zero to the hi end but not centered on the signal. The normal thing would be for the filter to go below zero if it is centered on the signal but that's not at all desirable. So I just move the filter so it starts at zero and is no longer centered on the signal just like you had used PBT to do it.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:20 AM, Paul Christensen wrote:
Carl,

But then doesn't the true frequency display shift by the amount of the offset? I suppose that's a temporary fix but certainly an annoyance.

Paul, W9AC

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Carl Moreschi
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:11 AM
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

What I do is once the BW exceed 2 times the sidetone, I just put the signal at the sidetone offset rather than the BW center.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:04 AM, Simon Brown wrote:
Max,

At the moment it would require some brain power to enable what's wanted. I'll think about this, but at the moment it's safest no to bodge the code.

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com


-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Max Mucci, N5NHJ via Groups.Io
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:50
To: Paul Christensen<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency. As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases. CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a
2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency. There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone.
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
Paul, W9AC













Re: CW Offset

Simon Brown
 

Paul,

I've noted this issue, FWIW the CW filter is designed to be symmetric around the center frequency, so if the center frequency is 500Hz then the filter is OK up to 100Hz; above 1000Hz the logic breaks down.

Obviously it's a weakness in the code 😊 .

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Paul Christensen
Sent: 30 April 2019 15:21
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Carl,

But then doesn't the true frequency display shift by the amount of the offset? I suppose that's a temporary fix but certainly an annoyance.

Paul, W9AC

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Carl Moreschi
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:11 AM
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

What I do is once the BW exceed 2 times the sidetone, I just put the signal at the sidetone offset rather than the BW center.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:04 AM, Simon Brown wrote:
Max,

At the moment it would require some brain power to enable what's wanted. I'll think about this, but at the moment it's safest no to bodge the code.

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com


-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Max Mucci, N5NHJ via Groups.Io
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:50
To: Paul Christensen<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency. As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases. CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a
2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency. There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone.
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
Paul, W9AC








Re: CW Offset

Carl Moreschi <n4py3@...>
 

No. The filter is adjusted so that it goes from zero to the hi end but not centered on the signal. The normal thing would be for the filter to go below zero if it is centered on the signal but that's not at all desirable. So I just move the filter so it starts at zero and is no longer centered on the signal just like you had used PBT to do it.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:20 AM, Paul Christensen wrote:
Carl,

But then doesn't the true frequency display shift by the amount of the offset? I suppose that's a temporary fix but certainly an annoyance.

Paul, W9AC

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Carl Moreschi
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:11 AM
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

What I do is once the BW exceed 2 times the sidetone, I just put the signal at the sidetone offset rather than the BW center.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:04 AM, Simon Brown wrote:
Max,

At the moment it would require some brain power to enable what's wanted. I'll think about this, but at the moment it's safest no to bodge the code.

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com


-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Max Mucci, N5NHJ via Groups.Io
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:50
To: Paul Christensen<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency. As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases. CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a
2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency. There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone.
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
Paul, W9AC












Re: CW Offset

Paul Christensen <w9ac@...>
 

Carl,

But then doesn't the true frequency display shift by the amount of the offset? I suppose that's a temporary fix but certainly an annoyance.

Paul, W9AC

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Carl Moreschi
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:11 AM
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

What I do is once the BW exceed 2 times the sidetone, I just put the signal at the sidetone offset rather than the BW center.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:04 AM, Simon Brown wrote:
Max,

At the moment it would require some brain power to enable what's wanted. I'll think about this, but at the moment it's safest no to bodge the code.

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com


-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Max Mucci, N5NHJ via Groups.Io
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:50
To: Paul Christensen<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency. As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases. CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a
2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency. There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone.
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
Paul, W9AC








Re: CW Offset

Carl Moreschi <n4py3@...>
 

What I do is once the BW exceed 2 times the sidetone, I just put the signal at the sidetone offset rather than the BW center.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 4/30/2019 10:04 AM, Simon Brown wrote:
Max,

At the moment it would require some brain power to enable what's wanted. I'll think about this, but at the moment it's safest no to bodge the code.

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com


-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Max Mucci, N5NHJ via Groups.Io
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:50
To: Paul Christensen<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency. As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases. CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a
2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency. There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone.
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
Paul, W9AC







Re: CW Offset

Simon Brown
 

Max,

At the moment it would require some brain power to enable what's wanted. I'll think about this, but at the moment it's safest no to bodge the code.

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

-----Original Message-----
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Max Mucci, N5NHJ via Groups.Io
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:50
To: Paul Christensen <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] CW Offset

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency. As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases. CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a
2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency. There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone.
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
Paul, W9AC


Re: CW Offset

 

Hello Paul,
No workaround here, your CW filter bandwidth is limited by double of the sidetone frequency.
Simon changed the modes (CW, RTTY) offset/center frequency approach in V3, no way to go back.

----------------------
73 de Max, N5NHJ (I8NHJ)

Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 6:55:09 AM, you wrote:

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth
exceeds the sidetone frequency.  As the filter bandwidth increases
beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases.  CW
pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.
 
For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure
a 2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz. 
That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other
station’s frequency.  There’s no means available (that I can
determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone. 
 
Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.
 
Paul, W9AC


Anan 8000

George Steube <at6c@...>
 

Hi Simon,
I have been using SDR v 3.0.7 with my A8K.?? Is there anyway to calibrate the PA output by band similar to HPSDR??? The problem I am having is that when I use tune the Drive goes to 10 and the radio power is 159W on my watt meter.?? Also how do I set the drive level I when tune is used??? Since the drive vs power out of the Anan radios is nonlinear I normally calibrate the PA to deliver 50 watts at a drive setting of 50.?? This allows for fine adjustment of high gain amplifiers.
73, George
W2GS


CW Offset

Paul Christensen <w9ac@...>
 

I’m still seeing a CW offset error when the CW filter bandwidth exceeds the sidetone frequency.  As the filter bandwidth increases beyond that of the sidetone frequency, the CW pitch increases.  CW pitch should remain constant regardless of the filter bandwidth chosen.

 

For example, if my CW sidetone frequency is 600 Hz and I configure a 2.4 kHz CW filter, Low is set to 0 and High is set to 2.4kHz.  That creates a received CW pitch of 1.2 kHz when I’m on the other station’s frequency.  There’s no means available (that I can determine) to offset the pitch from 0 Hz to keep a 600 Hz sidetone. 

 

Transceiver is an ANAN 7000DLE running SDR Console v3.0.7.

 

Paul, W9AC


Re: Lime SDR transmit spurii

Allan Isaacs
 

I haven’t fired up my recently acquired TS940S or FT726R yet Simon but I’m sure they’ll be better than the Lime.

My pockets aren’t deep enough to even look at pictures of the TS890S although I did once buy a brand new HW5400 kit which I concealed in my suitcase.

 

I treat these SDRs as just a bit of fun, or actually a lot of fun given the rather nice program you’ve turned out to support them.

I’ll be looking a bit more at the transmit performance of the Lime later.

I hadn’t noticed until today the earlier comments dating from February but it seems a few others are finding similar results to mine.

There’s also talk about newer firmware which may help to improve transmit performance but comments about “bricking” put me off slightly.

I’ll report progress here…

http://www.radiomuseum.co.uk/converter.html

Allan G3PIY


From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io [mailto:main@SDR-Radio.groups.io] On Behalf Of Simon Brown
Sent: 29 April 2019 21:26
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Lime SDR transmit spurii

 

But,

 

The Chinese company making Hermes lite will still be selling units. Wait until I have it supported, will be a very good HF SDR for ~ $300. Not in the TS-890S class, but if you’re kind to it then the results should be very pleasing.

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

 

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Leon Koning
Sent: 29 April 2019 20:52
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Lime SDR transmit spurii

 

As for the Hermes, the website say:  limited time group buy and will close on April 1...

Does anyone have experience with the HackRF? Does it have a cleaner TX signal?

Prices are very acceptable now https://nl.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=AS_20190429114857&SearchText=sdr+transceiver

 


Re: Selecting RF64 but not getting it

Ken Alexander
 

No worries Simon.  At least it records everything!

No luck recording last night.  A series of thunderstorms hit just as the recording was to begin at 11:30 PM.  Our power went out shortly after and we're still without electricity now at 6:30 AM.

Ken,
So Phisai, Thailand
Blog:  bueng-ken.com


On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 00:49 Simon Brown <simon@...> wrote:

Ken,

 

Must be a bug, I’ll add diagnostics. Currently fighting too many fires here…

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

 

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ken Alexander
Sent: 29 April 2019 16:25
To: main@sdr-radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Selecting RF64 but not getting it

 

Just setting up to do another recording tonight.  I'll let you know tomorrow morning.


Ken Alexander

So Phisai, Thailand

Blog:  bueng-ken.com

 

 

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:27 PM Simon Brown <simon@...> wrote:

Ah,

 

Thanks – the last screenshot shows me that it should have recorded a single file but didn’t. Curious…

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

 

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ken Alexander
Sent: 29 April 2019 14:56
To: main@sdr-radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Selecting RF64 but not getting it

 

Hi Simon,

 

I'm pretty sure I didn't edit anything, but I'll be more aware of that next time I have to.  Attached are some screenshots.  I hope they're what you're after.  I tried to send you everything I could think of.

 

Thanks again!


Ken Alexander

So Phisai, Thailand

Blog:  bueng-ken.com

 

 

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:29 PM Simon Brown <simon@...> wrote:

Ken,

 

Also – if you edit a definition you must re-create the entries in the Scheduled Recordings window. I will make this more obvious.

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

 

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ken Alexander
Sent: 29 April 2019 08:13
To: main@sdr-radio.groups.io
Subject: [SDR-Radio] Selecting RF64 but not getting it

 

Hi Simon,

 

I'm selecting RF64 file format for my scheduled IQ recordings but it's giving me individual 1 gigabyte files instead.  Not a disaster, but not what was requested.

 

Screenshot of scheduler setup and file listing attached.  It did the same thing on my previous recording session.  Just noticed it today.

 

Thanks!


Ken Alexander

So Phisai, Thailand

Blog:  bueng-ken.com


Anan 8000

George Steube <at6c@...>
 

Hi Simon,
I have been using SDR v 3.0.7 with my A8K.?? Is there anyway to calibrate the PA output by band similar to HPSDR??? The problem I am having is that when I use tune the Drive goes to 10 and the radio power is 159W on my watt meter.?? How do I set the drive level I when tune is used??? Since the drive vs power out of the Anan radios is nonlinear I normally calibrate the PA to deliver 50 watts at a drive setting of 50.?? This allows for fine adjustment of high gain amplifiers.
73, George
W2GS


Re: Lime SDR transmit spurii

Simon Brown
 

But,

 

The Chinese company making Hermes lite will still be selling units. Wait until I have it supported, will be a very good HF SDR for ~ $300. Not in the TS-890S class, but if you’re kind to it then the results should be very pleasing.

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

 

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Leon Koning
Sent: 29 April 2019 20:52
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Lime SDR transmit spurii

 

As for the Hermes, the website say:  limited time group buy and will close on April 1...

Does anyone have experience with the HackRF? Does it have a cleaner TX signal?

Prices are very acceptable now https://nl.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=AS_20190429114857&SearchText=sdr+transceiver


Re: Lime SDR transmit spurii

Leon Koning
 

As for the Hermes, the website say:  limited time group buy and will close on April 1...

Does anyone have experience with the HackRF? Does it have a cleaner TX signal?

Prices are very acceptable now https://nl.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=AS_20190429114857&SearchText=sdr+transceiver


Re: Audio output to VAC not working

Simon Brown
 

Frank,

 

Thanks for the feedback. I’ve made it more obvious that the Devices window is not where you make the audio device selection. With luck this will remove any confusion for other users.

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com

 

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Frank
Sent: 29 April 2019 19:33
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Audio output to VAC not working

 

Thanks to both Barry and Simon for the replies -- it's fixed now.

My problem was I was trying to select the playback device in SDR Console 3.0.2 by going to Tools > Settings > Options > Audio > Playback > Devices, and selecting one of the Muzychenko VAC lines listed there. For some reason, if I highlighted one of the lines and clicked on "OK," the selection didn't "take," and no audio showed up as reaching the VAC line or the end app.

However, I then followed Barry's suggestion, and selected the output device from the dropdown under Receive on the left side of the SDR Console screen. (The dropdown initially was just labeled "Default," so it didn't click for me that it was for playback device selection.) Now everything is working great.

I should add that after trying a number of different SDR control programs, SDR Console is my favorite. I'll be trying to use it with all my SDRs (Perseus, Elad, Airspy, SDRplay) whenever possible.


swskeds frequency list

Leon Koning
 
Edited

It has been some while ago when this topic was discussed, so for anyone who joined later and wishes to have a very extensive frequency database then join swskeds@groups.io 
After acceptence download the .csv file and import it with the "Custom CSV" import function in SDR Console.

The combined file on this group containes 21.993 frequencies (now) and is regulary updated. It includes the most recent lists from AIR, Aoki, DWL, EiBi, FCC, HFCC and MBR (VLF/LF/HF).
When you already have a lot of FM/VHF/UHF frequencies in your database then (offcource) DON't select "replace all" while importing but "add".

However i advise to make a backup from your existing database: Archive (XML) - Save and start with a clean import and add your FM list here after. (i.e. FM list from the FMSCAN site)
The "Remove duplicates" option in SDR Console works fine but deletes only rules that are exactly the same. So after a few imports (add's) you'll end up with a lot of "near duplicates" with only minor differents and then its hard to tell wich ones are the recent ones.
Kind regards, Leon


Re: Audio output to VAC not working

Frank O'Donnell K6FOD
 

Thanks to both Barry and Simon for the replies -- it's fixed now.

My problem was I was trying to select the playback device in SDR Console 3.0.2 by going to Tools > Settings > Options > Audio > Playback > Devices, and selecting one of the Muzychenko VAC lines listed there. For some reason, if I highlighted one of the lines and clicked on "OK," the selection didn't "take," and no audio showed up as reaching the VAC line or the end app.

However, I then followed Barry's suggestion, and selected the output device from the dropdown under Receive on the left side of the SDR Console screen. (The dropdown initially was just labeled "Default," so it didn't click for me that it was for playback device selection.) Now everything is working great.

I should add that after trying a number of different SDR control programs, SDR Console is my favorite. I'll be trying to use it with all my SDRs (Perseus, Elad, Airspy, SDRplay) whenever possible.


Re: Lime SDR transmit spurii

Allan Isaacs
 

Exactly the same spurii with lower drive Sigi

Reducing the drive results in an apparently cleaner output but as you increase the sensitivity of the spectrum analyser you see exactly the same group of signals so lack of linearity isn’t the reason, and there’s nothing on the low side of the fundamental; all the spurii are on the high side. The distance between the signals seems to be precisely 250KHz.

I need to check other frequencies. I’ve only checked 100MHz so far.

Allan G3PIY


From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io [mailto:main@SDR-Radio.groups.io] On Behalf Of Siegfried Jackstien
Sent: 29 April 2019 18:51
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Lime SDR transmit spurii

 

question ... do you see same spurii with lower drive??

i also have the same with pluto ... but only with hig power ... a bit lower drive and signal is cleaner

... but only 20 db down??? no ... with higher output i have some signals around 45 db down ... and when i take lower power those signal are more 50 to 60 db down ... so i would say clean for normal use

greetz sigi dg9bfc

 

Am 29.04.2019 um 15:24 schrieb Allan Isaacs:

I bought my Lime SDR to use as an HF transmitter and thanks to Simon’s latest software 3.0.7 build 1466 I can now select the receiver input and the transmit output connectors.

I’ll be using a home-brew upconverter for the LF & HF bands which converts 0-30MHz to 50-80MHz and I’ve just started testing the Lime’s transmit capability but initially, rather than HF I tried 100MHz.

The program works fine. I’m using RX1 L input and TX1 L output and if I select the Transmit button with the rx and tx tuned to say exactly 100MHz in AM or FM for example I get a 100MHz output from TX1 L with a level into 50 ohms ranging from something like -66dBm to +9.9dBm depending on the drive setting.

However, I also see other signals viz. 100.25MHz at 20dB down, 100.50MHz at 40dB down and others spaced at 250KHz getting weaker as the frequency rises. Are these spurii resulting from the design of the Lime or what?

Allan G3PIY

 


Re: Lime SDR transmit spurii

Siegfried Jackstien
 

question ... do you see same spurii with lower drive??

i also have the same with pluto ... but only with hig power ... a bit lower drive and signal is cleaner

... but only 20 db down??? no ... with higher output i have some signals around 45 db down ... and when i take lower power those signal are more 50 to 60 db down ... so i would say clean for normal use

greetz sigi dg9bfc


Am 29.04.2019 um 15:24 schrieb Allan Isaacs:

I bought my Lime SDR to use as an HF transmitter and thanks to Simon’s latest software 3.0.7 build 1466 I can now select the receiver input and the transmit output connectors.

I’ll be using a home-brew upconverter for the LF & HF bands which converts 0-30MHz to 50-80MHz and I’ve just started testing the Lime’s transmit capability but initially, rather than HF I tried 100MHz.

The program works fine. I’m using RX1 L input and TX1 L output and if I select the Transmit button with the rx and tx tuned to say exactly 100MHz in AM or FM for example I get a 100MHz output from TX1 L with a level into 50 ohms ranging from something like -66dBm to +9.9dBm depending on the drive setting.

However, I also see other signals viz. 100.25MHz at 20dB down, 100.50MHz at 40dB down and others spaced at 250KHz getting weaker as the frequency rises. Are these spurii resulting from the design of the Lime or what?

Allan G3PIY