Re: V3.2 Released
Conrad, PA5Y
Hello Simon, I had a play with the Beta last night, very nice. Continuum works great as does the horizontal audio waterfall window. Thanks very much.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Simon Brown via groups.io
Sent: 20 September 2022 07:36 To: SDR-Radio <main@sdr-radio.groups.io> Subject: [SDR-Radio] V3.2 Released
SDR Console V3.2 now released.
"65th Anniversary edition."
- + - + - Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|
Re: V3.2 Released
f5mwa
Hello Simon,
Thank you for the new 3.2 release Ezio K3EK / F5MWA |
|
Re: V3.2 Released
EA7HGL
Thank you very much Simon.
Antº Domingo (EA7HGL) |
|
V3.2 Released
SDR Console V3.2 now released.
https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=1722
-- - + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|
Re: How To: Connect to Pluto via Ethernet (Network)?
Matthias
Hi Ingolf,
I added a sentence in the description to make the issue more obvious.
Thank you very much for your hint.
Kind regards
Matthias
Von: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Im Auftrag von Matthias Bopp via groups.io
Hi Ingolf,
I am glad you got it working. Your finding matches my description:
Update 3: A radio amateur had also problems, getting his Pluto connected to his Router. He was
Kind regards
Matthias
Von:
main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Im Auftrag von sm6fhz via groups.io
Hi all. |
|
Re: How To: Connect to Pluto via Ethernet (Network)?
Matthias
Hi Ingolf,
I am glad you got it working. Your finding matches my description:
Update 3: A radio amateur had also problems, getting his Pluto connected to his Router. He was
Kind regards
Matthias
Von: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
Im Auftrag von sm6fhz via groups.io
Hi all. |
|
KiwiSDR Switcher and downconverter update
applewiz2000 <rob@...>
Hi All,
I recently got planning permission to put up antennas and decided to build a special kiwiSDR board to select what I have in mind. A bit more than that - the board has a 2m downconverter. The 'Ukranian' transverter boards are no longer available, and in any case a basic receive converter is all I want. The concept is it selects 1-of-4 sources with the BeagleBone outputs, configurable on the kiwi webserver. A buck power converter produces 5V from a 12V solar charger Any comments, or anyone may find this useful? Small design changes can be made now, I will track the PCB next weekend. 73s, Rob M0RZF <300k attachment> |
|
Re: How To: Connect to Pluto via Ethernet (Network)?
sm6fhz
Hi all.
I promised to report my progress on this subject. It now works as expected. So, I received my Y-cable as recommended by Matthias. As Rolf commented, you do not need a Y-cable, just a USB micro to USB-A (f) adapter cable. The USB to Ethernet adapter is powered from the Pluto via the Data USB port just fine. So i just left the Y-end open. The USB to Ethernet adapter is a D-link DUB-E100. I set the [USB_ETHERNET] ipaddr_eth = 192.168.2.196 The PC was set to 192.168.2.10. No joy, i.e. no connection to the Pluto neither via the internal info page (port 80) nor via SDRC using the standard port 0. I also put a Ethernet switch in between the PC and the USB to Ethernet adapter. Still no joy. In the config.txt under [NETWORK] I had the standard ipaddr=192.168.2.1 ipaddr_host=192.168.2.10 netmask=255.255.255.0 I then used ZenMap (Nmap) to scan all involved ip-addresses. No ports were found at all. I then changed the [NETWORK] ipaddr=192.168.0.1 ipaddr_host=192.168.0.10 netmask=255.255.255.0 and kept the [USB_ETHERNET] ipaddr_eth = 192.168.2.196 And the PC at 192.168.2.10. Now everything sprung to life! Both the internal info page and the radio via SDRC was accessible. Now ZenMap shows two ports, 22 and 80. Setting up SDRC I used port 0 at first but moved to port 22 when finalizing the set-up. Both works just fine. It works exactly the same with the PC direct and via the Ethernet switch. The Lessons Learned from this is that the [NETWORK] and the [USB_ETHERNET] CAN NOT BE SET TO THE SAME SUB-NET. I enclose screenshots of the ZenMap display and the SDRC Set-up window with my working conditions. My next step will be to configure Port Fwd in my router to be able to access the Pluto remote via Internet. I hope my experiences here may help someone else to make it working as well. 73 / Ingolf, SM6FHZ |
|
Re: Pluto specifics
Playing with tomorrow's V3.2 release, I'm seeing 55dB down. May be able to improve on this...
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of Siegfried Jackstien via groups.io <siegfried.jackstien@...>
Sent: 18 September 2022 19:22 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Pluto specifics Comments.. Hmmm
The spurii you see depend a bit on the settings of the pluto... Or settings in sdr console...
Pluto can be quite clean if you use a bit lower power and add another gain stage in between... And filters for the band you want to use it on.. In rx and tx path!!
50 or 60 db below main signal with all unwanted signals spurs etc... is not easy
.... So.. Pluto is not to be used as a main station with a kw amp and big antennas... I bet other contesters will "want to kill you"... Grin...
But with a much smaller amp (so those spurii are milliwatts or less)... Its ok i think... You should measure and carefully set the levels way way down
And... Settings in console (example tx filter and drive settings)... Is the main thing that may produce a clean (or clean enough) signal... Or a very dirty signal with lots of ghost carriers..
Set power out to minus 20dbm and add a 20db stage behind (example a skyworks 65017). To get a quite clean signal..with 0 dbm
Is much better as cranking up the pluto to 0 dbm
Greetz sigi dg9bfc
Am 18.09.2022 13:28 schrieb "Conrad, PA5Y" <g0ruz@...>:
-- - + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|
Re: Pluto specifics
Siegfried Jackstien
Comments.. Hmmm The spurii you see depend a bit on the settings of the pluto... Or settings in sdr console... Pluto can be quite clean if you use a bit lower power and add another gain stage in between... And filters for the band you want to use it on.. In rx and tx path!! 50 or 60 db below main signal with all unwanted signals spurs etc... is not easy .... So.. Pluto is not to be used as a main station with a kw amp and big antennas... I bet other contesters will "want to kill you"... Grin... But with a much smaller amp (so those spurii are milliwatts or less)... Its ok i think... You should measure and carefully set the levels way way down And... Settings in console (example tx filter and drive settings)... Is the main thing that may produce a clean (or clean enough) signal... Or a very dirty signal with lots of ghost carriers.. Set power out to minus 20dbm and add a 20db stage behind (example a skyworks 65017). To get a quite clean signal..with 0 dbm Is much better as cranking up the pluto to 0 dbm Greetz sigi dg9bfc Am 18.09.2022 13:28 schrieb "Conrad, PA5Y" <g0ruz@...>:
|
|
Re: Minimal SDRC Interface
Bill Nollman
Hi Conrad, it's Microsoft OneDrive. It should work. It's not my favorite cloud file service but it's where I have plenty of free space. I guess try it again and it that doesn't work I can try loading them to a friends Dropbox. Just email me offlist and we can give that a try.
Bill |
|
Re: Minimal SDRC Interface
Conrad, PA5Y
Hello Bill, I started to download and had lots of Network failures, then at 7GB of 7.5GB on the first file I got the following error.
Failed – no file, is this just because of too many downloads?
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Bill Nollman via groups.io
Sent: 16 September 2022 12:13 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Minimal SDRC Interface
Simon, here you go. 5 minutes (and 30GB) of the most uninteresting radio market in the US. Plenty of big signals, Low Power signals, HD signals and little room for DX. Which is what makes SDR's and DXpeditions so much fun! In fairness I
hear the Euro dial is even worse. And, if I turn the antenna 45 degrees things aren't quite as bad. |
|
Re: Minimal SDRC Interface
Conrad, PA5Y
Thanks Bill, downloading now. I am looking forward to listening to these.
Conrad
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Bill Nollman via groups.io
Sent: 16 September 2022 12:13 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Minimal SDRC Interface
Simon, here you go. 5 minutes (and 30GB) of the most uninteresting radio market in the US. Plenty of big signals, Low Power signals, HD signals and little room for DX. Which is what makes SDR's and DXpeditions so much fun! In fairness I
hear the Euro dial is even worse. And, if I turn the antenna 45 degrees things aren't quite as bad. |
|
Re: Pluto specifics
Conrad, PA5Y
Now I will wait for sigi’s comments.
Conrad
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Conrad, PA5Y via groups.io
Sent: 18 September 2022 13:26 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Pluto specifics
OK then NP 😉
From:
main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Simon Brown via groups.io
Yes,
QO-100.
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of Conrad, PA5Y via groups.io <g0ruz@...>
Do you refer to QO-100 Simon? For any other application I beg to differ. Do the job? Depends on what the job is. I would not use a Pluto with an amplifier for any terrestrial use. The output is horrible.
73
Conrad PA5Y
From:
main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Simon Brown via groups.io
And let us not forget that Pluto is very much an educational device which we amateurs have adopted.
Beats me why people spend many thousands of euro on Kuhne transverters etc. when you can do the job for far less with a Pluto and SG Labs after blaster.
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of jdow via groups.io <jdow@...>
The TL:DR is "USB2". The reason is the maximum bandwidth you can cram through a USB 2 connection. (AirSpy and AirSpy (R2) push the limits of USB 2 and sometimes get 10 MHz bandwidth without dropouts and without bitpacking. Without bitpacking 6 Msps is a better choice for reliability than trying to push it a little. NOTE that you likely will not get 6 Msps through an Ethernet connected Pluto. 100 MHz Ethernet is a little faster than 1/4th the speed of the USB2 connection. (A USB2 to 1 G ethernet adapter would probably make it to 6 Msps. I've never seen one.) {^_^} On 20220910 01:30:42, sm6fhz wrote:
- + - + - Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.
- + - + - Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|
Re: Pluto specifics
Conrad, PA5Y
OK then NP 😉
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Simon Brown via groups.io
Sent: 18 September 2022 13:18 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Pluto specifics
Yes,
QO-100.
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of Conrad, PA5Y via groups.io <g0ruz@...>
Do you refer to QO-100 Simon? For any other application I beg to differ. Do the job? Depends on what the job is. I would not use a Pluto with an amplifier for any terrestrial use. The output is horrible.
73
Conrad PA5Y
From:
main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Simon Brown via groups.io
And let us not forget that Pluto is very much an educational device which we amateurs have adopted.
Beats me why people spend many thousands of euro on Kuhne transverters etc. when you can do the job for far less with a Pluto and SG Labs after blaster.
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of jdow via groups.io <jdow@...>
The TL:DR is "USB2". The reason is the maximum bandwidth you can cram through a USB 2 connection. (AirSpy and AirSpy (R2) push the limits of USB 2 and sometimes get 10 MHz bandwidth without dropouts and without bitpacking. Without bitpacking 6 Msps is a better choice for reliability than trying to push it a little. NOTE that you likely will not get 6 Msps through an Ethernet connected Pluto. 100 MHz Ethernet is a little faster than 1/4th the speed of the USB2 connection. (A USB2 to 1 G ethernet adapter would probably make it to 6 Msps. I've never seen one.) {^_^} On 20220910 01:30:42, sm6fhz wrote:
- + - + - Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.
- + - + - Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|
Re: Pluto specifics
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of Conrad, PA5Y via groups.io <g0ruz@...>
Sent: 18 September 2022 12:10 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Pluto specifics Do you refer to QO-100 Simon? For any other application I beg to differ. Do the job? Depends on what the job is. I would not use a Pluto with an amplifier for any terrestrial use. The output is horrible.
73
Conrad PA5Y
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Simon Brown via groups.io
And let us not forget that Pluto is very much an educational device which we amateurs have adopted.
Beats me why people spend many thousands of euro on Kuhne transverters etc. when you can do the job for far less with a Pluto and SG Labs after blaster.
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of jdow via groups.io <jdow@...>
The TL:DR is "USB2". The reason is the maximum bandwidth you can cram through a USB 2 connection. (AirSpy and AirSpy (R2) push the limits of USB 2 and sometimes get 10 MHz bandwidth without dropouts and without bitpacking. Without bitpacking 6 Msps is a better choice for reliability than trying to push it a little. NOTE that you likely will not get 6 Msps through an Ethernet connected Pluto. 100 MHz Ethernet is a little faster than 1/4th the speed of the USB2 connection. (A USB2 to 1 G ethernet adapter would probably make it to 6 Msps. I've never seen one.) {^_^} On 20220910 01:30:42, sm6fhz wrote:
- + - + - Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. -- - + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|
Re: Pluto specifics
Conrad, PA5Y
Do you refer to QO-100 Simon? For any other application I beg to differ. Do the job? Depends on what the job is. I would not use a Pluto with an amplifier for any terrestrial use. The output is horrible.
73
Conrad PA5Y
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Simon Brown via groups.io
Sent: 11 September 2022 08:03 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Pluto specifics
And let us not forget that Pluto is very much an educational device which we amateurs have adopted.
Beats me why people spend many thousands of euro on Kuhne transverters etc. when you can do the job for far less with a Pluto and SG Labs after blaster.
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of jdow via groups.io <jdow@...>
The TL:DR is "USB2". The reason is the maximum bandwidth you can cram through a USB 2 connection. (AirSpy and AirSpy (R2) push the limits of USB 2 and sometimes get 10 MHz bandwidth without dropouts and without bitpacking. Without bitpacking 6 Msps is a better choice for reliability than trying to push it a little. NOTE that you likely will not get 6 Msps through an Ethernet connected Pluto. 100 MHz Ethernet is a little faster than 1/4th the speed of the USB2 connection. (A USB2 to 1 G ethernet adapter would probably make it to 6 Msps. I've never seen one.) {^_^} On 20220910 01:30:42, sm6fhz wrote:
- + - + - Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|
Re: RTL-SDR - Why 2.048MHz bandwidth?
John Aldridge
On 16/09/2022 05:54, Piotr Swiatkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:24 PM, John Aldridge wrote:Yup... perhaps the motivation was to avoid obsoleting all the existing receivers which didn't know how to decode AAC? John |
|
Re: RTL-SDR - Why 2.048MHz bandwidth?
John Aldridge
On 16/09/2022 10:12, jdow wrote:
Anybody who thinks they can hear better audio at 192 ksps than 96 ksps is kidding themselves.kbps, not ksps -- Cheers, John |
|
Re: Minimal SDRC Interface
🙂
Thanks, all downloaded, great for testing. Canadian FM is a very different beast, some great Jazz.
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> on behalf of Bill Nollman via groups.io <billct97@...>
Sent: 16 September 2022 11:13 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Minimal SDRC Interface Simon, here you go. 5 minutes (and 30GB) of the most uninteresting radio market in the US. Plenty of big signals, Low Power signals, HD signals and little room for DX. Which is what makes SDR's and DXpeditions so much fun! In fairness I hear the Euro dial
is even worse. And, if I turn the antenna 45 degrees things aren't quite as bad.
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ap7GzUuoMsHfm2Wh972rDBZeJk4A?e=lsQubh Enjoy! Bill Nollman Farmington, CT -- - + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems. |
|