The SDR Console's Markers are more like SDR#'s frequency manager or FMSuite's markers. The Band Plan shows entire bands instead of specific frequencies - like on this picture:

I'm using my RSPduo, playing around with my Wellbrook loop.  I've noticed over the last week since I started using my SDRs that I have "noise spikes" about every 52kHz starting around 26MHz all the

Thanks, Simon, for a fantastic product and all you have done for 2019. Wishing you all the best for 2020. I noticed with the new version 3.0.18, when reviewing SDR recordings, when I have repeat

Hey Guys, A few weeks ago I thinked about those markers. I also make markers for QO-100 like "《= CW/SSB =》" or "《= SSB", but it is confuse, when you see 10 markers on the spectrum display. If it

Bringing this topic back to the original request… Implementation of a ‘flip’ mode would greatly enhance the usefulness of SDRConsole’s Automatic Scheduler option for stations which have 0 to

One thing you could do is to create Markers. Should work fine but you would have to spend some time making them.. Fred KB4QZH

PDF linked below from SDR Play is aimed specifically at SDR Uno software but the hardware presumably stays relevant and so it does at least explain the position and manipulation of the RF and IF gains

They must have gotten smart. 25 years ago they were still sinewave tracking, which does NOT work very well. Everything I have tracked down so far suggests that if my boss at Univ of Michigan had been

That ugliness is what I fixed with some fairly simple math. Unfortunately I did not save a personal copy of the SW mod and the company did not want to go through the expense if requalifying the SW for

Yes, that is exactly how those Inmarsat terminals for ships operate .... like the NERA F-55 and F-77 ... Regards Matthias www.dd1us.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von:

Hi, that is true for az/el mounts ... then you have to turn the azimuth 180 degrees with infinite speed ... A solution for that are x/y mounts (which moves the zenith problem to two other points in

Hi Simon, Your approach will help but IMHO not solve the problem completely. The second satellite pass might have an azimuth offset of the AOS direction versus the last pass of say 30 degrees ...

By the way - if the antenna CAN do infinite rotation it is not difficult to build in automatic tracking once you acquire the satellite. The automation can be aided or not. What I worked on was aided

I propose to have a training run at the very beginning. You let the rotator run in one direction until it stops. Then you have a well defined status. From there the program needs to keep track of the

A real test for the SW is what it does when you are dead center under the satellite. That can get ugly. {o.o}

Ah - work in reverse means flip the antenna through vertical and down the other side, right? The antenna for which I did pointing software was 0 to 360 degrees (relative to bow of boat) and 0 to 90

Hi, Just thought I'd pass this along as it might be helpful to others. Running a RSPdx. With the suggestions I received, my Audio is now just fine. Biggest factor was reducing the BW to 500 KHz. So,

Even then the rotator needs to rotate 720 degrees and report 0 to 720 degrees not 0 to 360 if it is going to work "every time". If it only reports antenna position modulo 360 (0-360 readout) then no

How does it handle the scenario that happens with a 360 degree limited rotator when the satellite flies past the stops, usually at due North? How does the program understand where the antenna

I would have thought that the hardware bandwidth filters in the rsp's would solve the image problems. Perhaps the skirts of those filters are not steep enough. I know that at times I have heard BC