|
R: NetSDR coming soon.
It sounds really great! I like the idea of the internal downconverter.Two questions:
What frequencies will be covered with the downconverter?
Do you think that will be possible to demodulate
It sounds really great! I like the idea of the internal downconverter.Two questions:
What frequencies will be covered with the downconverter?
Do you think that will be possible to demodulate
|
By
Giampiero Bernardini
·
#2254
·
|
|
Re: Center Frequency Option
Hi,
Everything in this release is working fine for me as far as decoding and audio quality goes so I'm not whining about that....
It would be great if there was an option to PIN the tuning cursor in
Hi,
Everything in this release is working fine for me as far as decoding and audio quality goes so I'm not whining about that....
It would be great if there was an option to PIN the tuning cursor in
|
By
joni_ellen <no_spam@...>
·
#2253
·
|
|
Center Frequency Option
Simon,
Have you incorporated a way to set the currentreceive frequency into the center of the spectrum/waterfall window? Idon't see any way to do that.
Thanks for all your hard work on the
Simon,
Have you incorporated a way to set the currentreceive frequency into the center of the spectrum/waterfall window? Idon't see any way to do that.
Thanks for all your hard work on the
|
By
Mike
·
#2252
·
|
|
Re: Build 472 WORKS Great
Sebastian...
I don't want to confuse anyone with my last post. I don't think Simon has installed the intregation option on the SDR Console yet for CAT control. I was referring to two different
Sebastian...
I don't want to confuse anyone with my last post. I don't think Simon has installed the intregation option on the SDR Console yet for CAT control. I was referring to two different
|
By
davidjmessing
·
#2251
·
|
|
Re: Build 472 WORKS Great
All:
I somehow 'lost' the serial port settings (or options) in SDR-Console and can't figure out how to get it back!
I had tried setting up my FT-950/IF-2000/SDR-IQ but didn't have any luck, I know
All:
I somehow 'lost' the serial port settings (or options) in SDR-Console and can't figure out how to get it back!
I had tried setting up my FT-950/IF-2000/SDR-IQ but didn't have any luck, I know
|
By
Sebastian <w4as@...>
·
#2250
·
|
|
Build 472 WORKS Great
Simon,
Last week I emailed saying 471 was crashing on my XP machine. This morning I loaded 472 and it works GREAT, no problems.
I have been following you through all the revisions from the
Simon,
Last week I emailed saying 471 was crashing on my XP machine. This morning I loaded 472 and it works GREAT, no problems.
I have been following you through all the revisions from the
|
By
davidjmessing
·
#2249
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
And I think i mentioned this - you will be able to use a GPS such as Trimble Thunderbolt. I have bought two of these and will add a GPS display.
You'll be able to work 'with a friend' monitoring
And I think i mentioned this - you will be able to use a GPS such as Trimble Thunderbolt. I have bought two of these and will add a GPS display.
You'll be able to work 'with a friend' monitoring
|
By
Simon HB9DRV <simon@...>
·
#2248
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
Paul,
This I can support via the serial port, in fact it's something I do have on my list. Via the remote computer I can control serial and parallel ports and the port on the radio.
Simon
Paul,
This I can support via the serial port, in fact it's something I do have on my list. Via the remote computer I can control serial and parallel ports and the port on the radio.
Simon
|
By
Simon HB9DRV <simon@...>
·
#2247
·
|
|
Re: b472 waterfall speed does not change + ...
Hi,
I got to the bottom of this last night, there will be a kit in a day or two.
An important change with RC1 is replacing speed with resolution, higher resolution = slower updates due to the
Hi,
I got to the bottom of this last night, there will be a kit in a day or two.
An important change with RC1 is replacing speed with resolution, higher resolution = slower updates due to the
|
By
Simon HB9DRV <simon@...>
·
#2246
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
What he said:
We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like:
· diversity reception,
· adaptive polarity,
· triangulation,
· direction finding
·
What he said:
We plan some very exciting feature with this radio like:
· diversity reception,
· adaptive polarity,
· triangulation,
· direction finding
·
|
By
Simon HB9DRV <simon@...>
·
#2245
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
Great news Pieter, it's going to be a dream machine.
Since the Net-sdr has converter switching capabilities, does it also offer remote antenna switching?
If not, will this at some stage being
Great news Pieter, it's going to be a dream machine.
Since the Net-sdr has converter switching capabilities, does it also offer remote antenna switching?
If not, will this at some stage being
|
By
Paul
·
#2244
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
Mark,
Of course. Everyting runs synchronous to the 80 MHzclock. There will be two reflock options. One has -155 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz and onehas -171 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz. The unlocked stability will
Mark,
Of course. Everyting runs synchronous to the 80 MHzclock. There will be two reflock options. One has -155 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz and onehas -171 dBc/Hz at 10 KHz. The unlocked stability will
|
By
RFSPACE
·
#2243
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
Hi Pieter,
will the LO for the "internal downconverters for VHF" also be locked to the reference, if that option is fitted?
Regards, Mark
Hi Pieter,
will the LO for the "internal downconverters for VHF" also be locked to the reference, if that option is fitted?
Regards, Mark
|
By
Mark \(G4PCS\) <g4pcs@...>
·
#2242
·
|
|
Re: Spectravue generated files - UTC displayed correctly? (Build 472) [1 Attachment]
Hi Simon,
image attached showing both console and SV dialogs with info for the same file... shows one hour difference in UTC start time. Very strange.
Regards, Mark
Hi Simon,
image attached showing both console and SV dialogs with info for the same file... shows one hour difference in UTC start time. Very strange.
Regards, Mark
|
By
Mark \(G4PCS\) <g4pcs@...>
·
#2241
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
Joe,
The NetSDR and SDR-IP are both superior and more expensive than the SDR-IQ. We have optimized the sensitivity, 2nd and 3rd order intermod, phase noise and front end filtering. In addition, both
Joe,
The NetSDR and SDR-IP are both superior and more expensive than the SDR-IQ. We have optimized the sensitivity, 2nd and 3rd order intermod, phase noise and front end filtering. In addition, both
|
By
RFSPACE
·
#2240
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
Joe,
It will be in the same league or better than thePerseus SDR and Flex 1,2,3...5000.
Pieter
Joe,
It will be in the same league or better than thePerseus SDR and Flex 1,2,3...5000.
Pieter
|
By
RFSPACE
·
#2239
·
|
|
Re: NetSDR coming soon.
Pieter,
With regard to your statement. "The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers"
Does that mean you consider the Net SDR to be superior to the SDR-IQ?
Thanks for your
Pieter,
With regard to your statement. "The performance is phenomenal compared to the top performers"
Does that mean you consider the Net SDR to be superior to the SDR-IQ?
Thanks for your
|
By
Joseph Mettee
·
#2238
·
|
|
NetSDR coming soon.
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing beforewe start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to
Steve,
The NetSDR is ethernet based instead of USB. The radio is pretty much finished, we are waiting for the FCC and CE testing beforewe start shipping. The performance is phenomenal compared to
|
By
RFSPACE
·
#2237
·
|
|
Re: Question/Suggestion
Thanks Simon for the reply :-)
The Net SDR..............is that basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If not, then could you point me in a good
Thanks Simon for the reply :-)
The Net SDR..............is that basically internet based???? If so, can it operate outside the internet??? If not, then could you point me in a good
|
By
Steve
·
#2236
·
|
|
Re: SDR-Radio Server requested feature
I've actually thought about a proper chat facility between the client & server, just haven't had time to add this.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
(All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and
I've actually thought about a proper chat facility between the client & server, just haven't had time to add this.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV, http://sdr-radio.com
(All E-mail verified to be RFC1149 and
|
By
Simon HB9DRV <simon@...>
·
#2235
·
|