|
Re: Speech Processor
Meh, I never used anything other than the pro-II microphone and its widest bandwidth. I felt silly being so narrow but WBFM just doesn't work on 3.5MHz through 4MHz. Well, neither does
Meh, I never used anything other than the pro-II microphone and its widest bandwidth. I felt silly being so narrow but WBFM just doesn't work on 3.5MHz through 4MHz. Well, neither does
|
By
jdow
·
#64029
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
Am 02.09.2021 um 00:00 schrieb Conrad, PA5Y:
i use 100 to 2.8 on qo100 (2.7 bw)
yes ... SLIGHT reverb is what i use here ... a "tiny bit" only just to make the audio a bit
Am 02.09.2021 um 00:00 schrieb Conrad, PA5Y:
i use 100 to 2.8 on qo100 (2.7 bw)
yes ... SLIGHT reverb is what i use here ... a "tiny bit" only just to make the audio a bit
|
By
Siegfried Jackstien
·
#64028
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
My first draft included a reference to CB radio, but I decided not to make that point because it was sigi who is clearly not a CB op.
But as usual, you are right, reverb would put me off too.
I
My first draft included a reference to CB radio, but I decided not to make that point because it was sigi who is clearly not a CB op.
But as usual, you are right, reverb would put me off too.
I
|
By
Conrad, PA5Y
·
#64027
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
Answers below.
By
Conrad, PA5Y
·
#64026
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
It seems to me that in the amateur radio segment, the most suitable implementation is WSPRnet. The required data is available on the servers of this network. Sometimes I run my local WSPR / FT8 / CW
It seems to me that in the amateur radio segment, the most suitable implementation is WSPRnet. The required data is available on the servers of this network. Sometimes I run my local WSPR / FT8 / CW
|
By
данила фадеев
·
#64025
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
Yeah I love the way Simon has that history plot displayed ! It is awesome. Imagine being able to see a full 24 hr of a certain station, like WWV etc and watching it's S/N
Yeah I love the way Simon has that history plot displayed ! It is awesome. Imagine being able to see a full 24 hr of a certain station, like WWV etc and watching it's S/N
|
By
Gedas
·
#64024
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
Seeing individual signals would not be the point. Seeing the changes in noise plus signal charted over months and compared with some of the more prestigious prediction programs would be
Seeing individual signals would not be the point. Seeing the changes in noise plus signal charted over months and compared with some of the more prestigious prediction programs would be
|
By
jdow
·
#64023
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
Haha...brings back memories of my days as a radio inspector with Department of Communications. That's a big 10-4 Joanne
Haha...brings back memories of my days as a radio inspector with Department of Communications. That's a big 10-4 Joanne
|
By
Brent Seres/ VE3CUS
·
#64022
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
If anyone is interested in taking a look, these canvases of the spectrum look something like the link below. I know most of the digital and analog signals in person, reading the spectrum that was
If anyone is interested in taking a look, these canvases of the spectrum look something like the link below. I know most of the digital and analog signals in person, reading the spectrum that was
|
By
данила фадеев
·
#64021
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
My own thoughts on mic processing..
1) Given the 5k max (and even that only in very rare instances) audio bandwidth that we're constrained to on HF, and given the vast selection of free (and powerful)
My own thoughts on mic processing..
1) Given the 5k max (and even that only in very rare instances) audio bandwidth that we're constrained to on HF, and given the vast selection of free (and powerful)
|
By
Mark Cayton
·
#64020
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
This is implemented in the SDRDataFile Analyzer ("Signal History" option). But it seems to me that the width limit of 10,000 pixels will be irrelevant for bands wider than 2-3 MHz. It is very
This is implemented in the SDRDataFile Analyzer ("Signal History" option). But it seems to me that the width limit of 10,000 pixels will be irrelevant for bands wider than 2-3 MHz. It is very
|
By
данила фадеев
·
#64019
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
Agree but it would be so nice to tune to a specific frequency (sometimes up in the HF bands) via console and gather our data w/o additional hardware and/or software. Console
Agree but it would be so nice to tune to a specific frequency (sometimes up in the HF bands) via console and gather our data w/o additional hardware and/or software. Console
|
By
Gedas
·
#64018
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
That would be VERY useful Simon. There are a lot of folks who would jump on being able to take that data and then generate some plots.
FYI, the history plot (like the
That would be VERY useful Simon. There are a lot of folks who would jump on being able to take that data and then generate some plots.
FYI, the history plot (like the
|
By
Gedas
·
#64017
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
For that you might also like an R888 so you could watch DC to ultra low infra red and see effects over that entire range. That would be fun, actually, worth dedicating something like a
For that you might also like an R888 so you could watch DC to ultra low infra red and see effects over that entire range. That would be fun, actually, worth dedicating something like a
|
By
jdow
·
#64016
·
|
|
Re: More Signal History
Export the data?
If really important I could write SH data to a SQLite database or XML.
Simon Brown, G4ELI
https://www.sdr-radio.com
Export the data?
If really important I could write SH data to a SQLite database or XML.
Simon Brown, G4ELI
https://www.sdr-radio.com
|
By
Simon Brown
·
#64015
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
Reverb? That's the "Good buddy" sound. A relatively flat spectrum with a broad notch at about 1.2 kHz, depending on the voice, concentrates your power where it does good. For DX and
Reverb? That's the "Good buddy" sound. A relatively flat spectrum with a broad notch at about 1.2 kHz, depending on the voice, concentrates your power where it does good. For DX and
|
By
jdow
·
#64014
·
|
|
More Signal History
I was admiring & appreciating the signal history feature of console and was wondering if there is a way to slow it WAY, WAY down so we could record & display on a single screen, say, 12
I was admiring & appreciating the signal history feature of console and was wondering if there is a way to slow it WAY, WAY down so we could record & display on a single screen, say, 12
|
By
Gedas
·
#64013
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
I agree buy a good microphone, although it need not be that good for amateur SSB and NBFM radio use. However a good microphone will not help you have punchy audio.
Having a good microphone AND
I agree buy a good microphone, although it need not be that good for amateur SSB and NBFM radio use. However a good microphone will not help you have punchy audio.
Having a good microphone AND
|
By
Conrad, PA5Y
·
#64012
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
do re mi fa so la si doooooooo
Am 01.09.2021 um 00:09 schrieb Gedas:
do re mi fa so la si doooooooo
Am 01.09.2021 um 00:09 schrieb Gedas:
|
By
Siegfried Jackstien
·
#64011
·
|
|
Re: Speech Processor
Gosh and I was so looking forward to hearing you sing fiorentini schnell (I hope I got the spelling right).
Gedas, W8BYA EN70JTGallery at http://w8bya.com (under repair)Light
Gosh and I was so looking forward to hearing you sing fiorentini schnell (I hope I got the spelling right).
Gedas, W8BYA EN70JTGallery at http://w8bya.com (under repair)Light
|
By
Gedas
·
#64010
·
|