|
Re: Virtual Here And Local Network
Okay, so yes- adding the RSPdx to my SDR Console server I can access it from outside my local network. That's great if I want to listen at work, as I do with my Afedri (I just remoted into my work PC to check) but I want to listen on other PCs in my house. Connecting to the server, SDR Console just times out on my laptop. Is it meant to be accessed from inside the network or do I have something configured incorrectly? My Afedri works outside of the server because it's connected to the home network.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 7:34 PM Dominic Dambro via groups.io <dominic1967=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote: I feel dumb that I didn't know about this. I do access my Afedri this way but I was thinking it worked because it was connected via ethernet. I'll look into this right away. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Re: Virtual Here And Local Network
I feel dumb that I didn't know about this. I do access my Afedri this way but I was thinking it worked because it was connected via ethernet. I'll look into this right away. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Re: Virtual Here And Local Network
Siegfried Jackstien
thats also what i thought ... as long as he only wants to receive he can use sdrc in client /server mode (one day simon may add also tx with a pluto or lime) wink wink dg9bfc sigi Am 01.02.2022 um 02:07 schrieb Kriss
Kliegle KA1GJU:
|
|
|
|
Re: Virtual Here And Local Network
Why not run the RSPdx in SDRC Server?
|
|
|
|
Virtual Here And Local Network
My main receiver is an Afedri LAN-IQ and I can access it from anywhere in the world using SDR Console. I love it. My "shack" runs a Windows 11 desktop PC and that's where my antennas feed into my SDRs.
I recently bought an RSPdx (it also stays connected to my desktop) and with VirtualHere, I can fool any PC within my local area network into thinking it's physically attached so that it can run with SDRuno (an app I'm not as crazy about.) Because of the demands of the data that USB needs to deliver, SDRuno must be set up to run in "Bulk" USB mode, not the typical Isochronous mode. It works perfectly this way- no lag or stutter. But I want it to work in SDR Console! Does SDR Console allow for configuring USB Bulk mode? Without it, the remote RSPdx is found but is unlistenable. Thanks, Dominic Dambro
|
|
|
|
Re: Ettus compatibility
#sdrconsolev3
#ettus
Hi Larry
Sorry, I missed your question in 2021 Larry. Busy on the ham bands and many other things to do , so I did not monitor this chat for a very long time. Actually there was no issue at all to connect the N200 under SDR console. The Ettus device search found the standard (default) ip address. I use win7/64 and UHD 4.0 at present. Switching to a surplus server mainboard end of last year with a Xeon CPU solved all bandwith problems I still had with high end I7 main boards. Both network cards (Intel Pro-1000 dual) and Intel x520-2 (10GB Fiber) work at full speed now with their their own dedicated PCx lanes. No shared bandwith! 73, Charly DF5VAE@...
|
|
|
|
Re: Ettus compatibility
#sdrconsolev3
#ettus
Hello Ray,
I you have some spare time pse let me know what firmware you use for your USRP X310 to communicate with SDR console. Pse mention also the UHD release, Do you install Winx64_VS2019 or an other version? I tried many combinations, but got no combination to work. 73, Charly DF5VAE@... PS: I use a low cost Fujitsu M720 server PC, with Xeon 2690 CPU, and Intel x520-2 Fiber adapter. With this hardware I was able to obtain 40 MHz bandwith with an USRP N200 and Intel Pro 1000 Network card. A high standard PC mainboard with I7 CPU limits bandwith between 10 to 20 MHz. The Xeon CPU on the M720 mainboard offers up to 40 PCx Lanes, no shared resources limiting the transfer bandwith.
|
|
|
|
Re: Bricked my Ettus X310
Hello Eric,
did you ever get a reply or a working image for your usrp X310 I had no problem to get an USRP N200 working with SDR-Console, but my USRP x310 was never recognised in SDR console. Tried many images (XG, HG) including older versions but no success at all. I flash via Windows command line, using the ETTUS commands. As I have no software skills I needed quite some time and tests to learn how to flash. 73 Charly, DF5VAE@...
|
|
|
|
Re: Andrus SDR
Hi Daniel I bought an Andrus a few years back, said to be from a house clearance, and replaced the short circuit network chip and much to my surprise it then worked perfectly. I think I paid about £60. I find it really good at lower frequencies down to a few KHz and OK up to 30MHz. It only covers a 400KHz bandwidth which is fine for ham bands but its chief advantage is it can be used at the end of an RJ45 cable well away from interference. USB power or about 6V at 350mA. I guess you could power it from a PoE adaptor but I haven’t tried that yet nor remote access via the Net but no reason why not. Very good build quality and would have cost almost £500 new. They are pretty rare so I guess that £90 plus postage makes it a good buy. SDR console works fine with it although not all bells and whistles seem to be covered probably because there are too few users to warrant the work. 73 Allan G3PIY From:
main@SDR-Radio.groups.io [mailto:main@SDR-Radio.groups.io] On Behalf Of Daniel Young
Apologies for my ignorance _._,_._,_
|
|
|
|
Re: Andrus SDR
Simon Brown
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Daniel Young
Sent: 29 January 2022 22:08 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Andrus SDR
Apologies for my ignorance -- - + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.
|
|
|
|
Re: Andrus SDR
Daniel Young
Could you tell me if this can work in same manner as kiwi sdr and provide web based users? I have a chance of a 1.5 for £100 which I don't know if it's a bargain or a lost cause for my application as the information I could find seemed clear as mud so far.Apologies for my ignorance Thanks
|
|
|
|
Re: Pluto:: Spurious Emissions
Siegfried Jackstien
if you do not even know how to tune your (reference) frequency (and lnb offset) THEN I HIGHLY RECOMMEND TWO THINGS :
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
let ME take a closer look and RTFM ;-) dg9bfc sigi Am 28.01.2022 um 21:40 schrieb Jacques RAMBAUD:
Sigi,
|
|
|
|
Re: Cant get Console to run
Dennis Matzen
Steve, did you get this resolved? If so what was it?
-- Dennis KA6FUB
|
|
|
|
Re: Pluto:: Spurious Emissions
jdow
The conversion frequency setting in the device
definition is the number you must fine tune. It's possible even if
it's a bit awkward.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
{^_^}
On 20220128 12:40:56, Jacques RAMBAUD
wrote:
Sigi,
|
|
|
|
Re: Pluto:: Spurious Emissions
Jacques RAMBAUD
Sigi,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I need your help on how to set up my Pluto, you said '' your lnb setting should be (after tuning xo corection) set that you get the beacon closer to 750 '' What is xo correction ??? 73 Jacques F6BKI
Le 27/01/2022 à 21:55, Siegfried Jackstien a écrit :
bonjour jacques
|
|
|
|
Re: Settings for USCG Weather on RTTY?
My Google hit's on 4006.5Hz pointed towards USCG websites... but I think Google read 406z as in 0406UTC?
Thanks for the replies! Back to your regularly scheduled programming. 😬 73 Kriss KA1GJU
|
|
|
|
Missed spots PSKREPORTER
Ian McCabe
Hi all Can anyone help me with a minor problem here. I know there are a lot of smart guys on here, probably not the right place to ask on this subject but failed elsewhere I listen FT8 160m most nights and run JTDX with PSKREPORTER and Gridtracker god bless its sole I monitor mainly DX spots and notice despite perfect CQ,s with the locator quite a few stations never make the PSKREPORTER map A couple of friends using the same set up and settings do not have this problem. EG It took over an hour and at least 13/14 CQ,s for XV1X to appear. I just use the basic settings in JTDX, any advice will be appreciated and apologies for being off topic I have heard this maybe server related but whose server I do not know, I have tried changing ports without success Appreciate any advice Regards Ian G0FYD Airspy HF plus discovery Wellbrook 80ft rotatable loop Software JTDX
|
|
|
|
Re: Settings for USCG Weather on RTTY?
N2MS
Chris,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The USCG broadcasts weather broadcasts using Mode B SITOR. Is this the service you are asking about? Please see attached pdf. Mike N2MS
On 01/28/2022 5:42 AM Kriss Kliegle KA1GJU <kliegle@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Pluto:: Spurious Emissions
jdow
The basic problem with the transmit side and really
the receive side as well is the math involved requires small
fractions of a degree and small fractions of a dB precision in
setting the nulling conditions. You can setup 50 dB to 60 dB with
modest effort. But the components involved are slightly
temperature sensitive. So your 50 dB balance can decay to 40 dB or
30 dB fairly quickly. This was expected and shown in the Built In
Test Equipment in the prelaunch test equipment for the first set of GPS Phase 2B satellites. The signal is a
pair of PN sequence modulated signals sent at exact quadrature on
the carrier frequencies. The test equipment was required to be
within something like a quarter of a degree of each other and the
amplitudes had to be a fraction of a dB of correct. While aligning
the BITE transmitter I noticed I could fall out of specification
by simply moving one of the 3" or so long double shielded 1/4 inch
cables connected to the quadrature modulators. It required pretty
much lab conditions to keep full accuracy. The 1/4 degree is
significantly worse than the 50 dB conditions as I recall the
math.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On top of that you have received signals to consider. The isolation between TX and RX on Lime or Pluto is not very exciting. It is at a level that the settings for TX can mess with RX and vice versa. At least in the satellite case you folks get to play with the TX and RX local oscillators are frequencies that are not directly harmonically related. So the cross effects will be minimum except for the temperature increase when transmitting. {^_^}
On 20220128 06:48:10, Jacques RAMBAUD
wrote:
Hello all,
|
|
|
|
Re: Pluto:: Spurious Emissions
Jacques RAMBAUD
Hello all,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thank you Sigi for the help, The spurious I reported before was due to the fact that I used the XIT (Receive side) to align my RX and TX frequency . I understand now that it as to be done with RIT, please confirm. The spurious I see now are about -56 dBc up to a Drive level of 50% on the TX control which correspond to about - 16dBm CW carrier (Tune mode) . Reducing the Drive level down tp 10% does not help much, about -58 dBc. At 70% Drive level I measure -55dBc in Tune mode (CW) . On Tune mode (CW) the spurious are slightly lower if Bandwith is set at 1.2 MHz (select radio) rather than set at 750 KHz. I do not know if the spurious can be lowered further , for QO-100 operation it is very acceptable but for terestrial I doubt . 73 jacques F6BKI
Le 27/01/2022 à 23:10, Siegfried Jackstien a écrit :
NEVER NEVER NEVER USE OFFSET ON THE BIRD!!! not with lime and not with the pluto
|
|
|