Date   

Re: RSPdx with SDRPlay 1.41 beta code #sdruno #sdrplay

John Freeman
 

Thanks for checking!   I'll stick with SDRUno 1.40/API 3.07 for now.   

My interpretation so far, for the RSPdx, is that the V3 dll will not work with API 3.08, and the V2 dll does not support RSPdx in any case, it needs the V3 dll.   (or maybe will be V4 dll when 1.41/3.08 is released  :)) 

Barney, not sure if you were serious about SDRUno 1.42, I think that is still a fuzzy roadmap line item for SDRPlay at this point.   

John


Re: SDR console/Spectravue IQ recordings

Simon Brown
 

Hi,

 

Not possible, we use different metadata. What features do you need on the SDR Console playback?

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ivan Dias via groups.io
Sent: 14 August 2021 16:51
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: [SDR-Radio] SDR console/Spectravue IQ recordings

 

Hello!

Is there a way to open IQ recorded with SDR Console with Spectravue?

For professional reasons, I would prefer to playback the recordings with Spectravue, but unlike the recordings done with Elad SW2 or HDSDR, the wav files recordings made with SDR console are invalid when I try to open with Spectravue.

If it's not possible yet, would be really interesting option.

Thank you.

Ivan


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Re: RSPdx with SDRPlay 1.41 beta code #sdruno #sdrplay

Simon Brown
 

And,

 

As far as I can tell, the documentation for the 3.08 API is not yet available, so I can’t even start on tentative support. When all is published it’ll only take a day or so.

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Barney Breet
Sent: 14 August 2021 18:05
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] RSPdx with SDRPlay 1.41 beta code #sdrplay #sdruno

 

Hi,

Install SDRUno 1.42, works fine then with SDR Console 3.1 - 64bit.

Regards,

Barney - M1ABV

On 14/08/2021 15:16, John Freeman wrote:

Hi All,

I have been running my RSPdx with SDR Console 3.1 with no problem, after installing SDRUno 1.40, API 3.07,  and creating the definition by searching SDRPlay V3.   

Now when I install SDRUno 1.41 beta, with its new API 3.08, the instruction is to use V2 for now as the new code, I assume API 3.08, is not compatible with SDR Console V3 yet.   However, when I search to create a new definition using SDRPlay V2, my RSPdx is detected, but it comes up as an SDRDuo and the controls in SDR Console are wrong.   If I search using V3, the RSPdx is detected, but the radio will not start.

I reinstalled SDRUno 1.40 and everything works as it did again with the V3 definition, but I find that a search using V2 also results in an SDRDuo definition, so this is not directly related to the SDRUno 1.41 beta.  

I have reinstalled SDR Console, but the problem still occurs.   The info in the definition screen (attached) implies that the dll being used is for 2.13 which does not support RSPdx?    Do I have the wrong dll somehow?   Any other ideas or things to check?   



Thanks,
John


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Re: RSPdx with SDRPlay 1.41 beta code #sdruno #sdrplay

Barney Breet
 

Hi,

Install SDRUno 1.42, works fine then with SDR Console 3.1 - 64bit.

Regards,

Barney - M1ABV

On 14/08/2021 15:16, John Freeman wrote:
Hi All,

I have been running my RSPdx with SDR Console 3.1 with no problem, after installing SDRUno 1.40, API 3.07,  and creating the definition by searching SDRPlay V3.   

Now when I install SDRUno 1.41 beta, with its new API 3.08, the instruction is to use V2 for now as the new code, I assume API 3.08, is not compatible with SDR Console V3 yet.   However, when I search to create a new definition using SDRPlay V2, my RSPdx is detected, but it comes up as an SDRDuo and the controls in SDR Console are wrong.   If I search using V3, the RSPdx is detected, but the radio will not start.

I reinstalled SDRUno 1.40 and everything works as it did again with the V3 definition, but I find that a search using V2 also results in an SDRDuo definition, so this is not directly related to the SDRUno 1.41 beta.  

I have reinstalled SDR Console, but the problem still occurs.   The info in the definition screen (attached) implies that the dll being used is for 2.13 which does not support RSPdx?    Do I have the wrong dll somehow?   Any other ideas or things to check?   



Thanks,
John


SDR console/Spectravue IQ recordings

Ivan Dias
 

Hello!

Is there a way to open IQ recorded with SDR Console with Spectravue?

For professional reasons, I would prefer to playback the recordings with Spectravue, but unlike the recordings done with Elad SW2 or HDSDR, the wav files recordings made with SDR console are invalid when I try to open with Spectravue.

If it's not possible yet, would be really interesting option.

Thank you.

Ivan


Re: RSPdx with SDRPlay 1.41 beta code #sdruno #sdrplay

Simon Brown
 

Easy (I think),

 

The SDRUno 1.41 beta is not compatible with SDR Console. I’ll maybe install it tomorrow and see what needs doing, not I think I read somewhere that the 1.41 beta may change in the future.

 

Anyway, all I can suggest is restoring SDRUno 1.40.

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of John Freeman
Sent: 14 August 2021 15:17
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: [SDR-Radio] RSPdx with SDRPlay 1.41 beta code #sdrplay #sdruno

 

Hi All,

I have been running my RSPdx with SDR Console 3.1 with no problem, after installing SDRUno 1.40, API 3.07,  and creating the definition by searching SDRPlay V3.   

Now when I install SDRUno 1.41 beta, with its new API 3.08, the instruction is to use V2 for now as the new code, I assume API 3.08, is not compatible with SDR Console V3 yet.   However, when I search to create a new definition using SDRPlay V2, my RSPdx is detected, but it comes up as an SDRDuo and the controls in SDR Console are wrong.   If I search using V3, the RSPdx is detected, but the radio will not start.

I reinstalled SDRUno 1.40 and everything works as it did again with the V3 definition, but I find that a search using V2 also results in an SDRDuo definition, so this is not directly related to the SDRUno 1.41 beta.  

I have reinstalled SDR Console, but the problem still occurs.   The info in the definition screen (attached) implies that the dll being used is for 2.13 which does not support RSPdx?    Do I have the wrong dll somehow?   Any other ideas or things to check?   



Thanks,
John


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


RSPdx with SDRPlay 1.41 beta code #sdruno #sdrplay

John Freeman
 

Hi All,

I have been running my RSPdx with SDR Console 3.1 with no problem, after installing SDRUno 1.40, API 3.07,  and creating the definition by searching SDRPlay V3.   

Now when I install SDRUno 1.41 beta, with its new API 3.08, the instruction is to use V2 for now as the new code, I assume API 3.08, is not compatible with SDR Console V3 yet.   However, when I search to create a new definition using SDRPlay V2, my RSPdx is detected, but it comes up as an SDRDuo and the controls in SDR Console are wrong.   If I search using V3, the RSPdx is detected, but the radio will not start.

I reinstalled SDRUno 1.40 and everything works as it did again with the V3 definition, but I find that a search using V2 also results in an SDRDuo definition, so this is not directly related to the SDRUno 1.41 beta.  

I have reinstalled SDR Console, but the problem still occurs.   The info in the definition screen (attached) implies that the dll being used is for 2.13 which does not support RSPdx?    Do I have the wrong dll somehow?   Any other ideas or things to check?   



Thanks,
John


Re: HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

Siegfried Jackstien
 

i have an easy thing for you :-)

you can "delete" tx voice keyer from your todo list https://www.sdr-radio.com/Future ... cause we now have one (that works quite well!!)

greetz sigi dg9bfc

Am 14.08.2021 um 07:22 schrieb Simon Brown:

Indeed,

 

Pluto alone is the way to go. I’ll be 64 soon, no more mayor software headaches please – brain can’t handle it 😊 .

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Siegfried Jackstien
Sent: 13 August 2021 21:54
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

 

yes maybe youz could start sdrc 2 times and marriage them via virtual comporst and commander

but in my view its much easier to just use the pluto alone

dg9bfc sigi

Am 13.08.2021 um 21:24 schrieb jdow:

At present you need to make two instances of SDR Console cooperate with each other. I believe this has been done serial interface.

A few minutes of thought suggest it is technically possible to crank the design of something like SDRConsole around to allow different RX and TX conversion stages (front end/back end respectively.) I am not sure that it is technically feasible without a design contemplating this from the very beginning. It breaks just a whole LOT of normal starting conditions for the design of an existing tool.

I'm afraid you are stuck with the hard way in the first paragraph above.
{^_^}

On 20210813 10:41:21, dietrich@... wrote:

For stability reasond I'd like to run like this. But how?

 


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Re: Forums

jdow
 

I posted this to the forum a few days ago.... Somehow  you missed it.
{^_-}

On 20210813 22:42:20, Simon Brown wrote:

Thanks 😊 .

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of jdow
Sent: 14 August 2021 06:33
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Forums

 

The scrolling banner could use a little editing. It still thinks 3.1 is a prospective release.

{^_-}

On 20210813 22:20:52, Simon Brown wrote:

So,

 

Woke up this morning, forums misbehaving. Quick reboot of the server and all is now OK.

 

Software…

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 


--

- + - + -

Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.

 


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Re: Forums

Simon Brown
 

Thanks 😊 .

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of jdow
Sent: 14 August 2021 06:33
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Forums

 

The scrolling banner could use a little editing. It still thinks 3.1 is a prospective release.

{^_-}

On 20210813 22:20:52, Simon Brown wrote:

So,

 

Woke up this morning, forums misbehaving. Quick reboot of the server and all is now OK.

 

Software…

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 


--

- + - + -

Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.

 


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Re: Forums

jdow
 

The scrolling banner could use a little editing. It still thinks 3.1 is a prospective release.

{^_-}

On 20210813 22:20:52, Simon Brown wrote:

So,

 

Woke up this morning, forums misbehaving. Quick reboot of the server and all is now OK.

 

Software…

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Re: HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

Simon Brown
 

Indeed,

 

Pluto alone is the way to go. I’ll be 64 soon, no more mayor software headaches please – brain can’t handle it 😊 .

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 

From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io> On Behalf Of Siegfried Jackstien
Sent: 13 August 2021 21:54
To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

 

yes maybe youz could start sdrc 2 times and marriage them via virtual comporst and commander

but in my view its much easier to just use the pluto alone

dg9bfc sigi

Am 13.08.2021 um 21:24 schrieb jdow:

At present you need to make two instances of SDR Console cooperate with each other. I believe this has been done serial interface.

A few minutes of thought suggest it is technically possible to crank the design of something like SDRConsole around to allow different RX and TX conversion stages (front end/back end respectively.) I am not sure that it is technically feasible without a design contemplating this from the very beginning. It breaks just a whole LOT of normal starting conditions for the design of an existing tool.

I'm afraid you are stuck with the hard way in the first paragraph above.
{^_^}

On 20210813 10:41:21, dietrich@... wrote:

For stability reasond I'd like to run like this. But how?

 


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


Forums

Simon Brown
 

So,

 

Woke up this morning, forums misbehaving. Quick reboot of the server and all is now OK.

 

Software…

 

Simon Brown, G4ELI

https://www.sdr-radio.com

 


--
- + - + -
Please use https://forum.sdr-radio.com:4499/ when posting questions or problems.


From OP: Re: CSVUserList Browser Question

rmrrgs <rgsrose@...>
 

Hi,

My thinking was to use it in "reverse". 
It has the feature where it will try to ID the station you are tuned to from it's database, and pull up the appropriate line of data for displaying.
It works quite well in this mode, and is really helpful

There would then be no need, if used in this mode, for a lot of lines.

I was wondering it it could show across the width at the bottom, e.g., with a vertical
dimension of only 2 or 3 CSVULB lines.

Regards,
Bob


Re: HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

Siegfried Jackstien
 

yes maybe youz could start sdrc 2 times and marriage them via virtual comporst and commander

but in my view its much easier to just use the pluto alone

dg9bfc sigi

Am 13.08.2021 um 21:24 schrieb jdow:

At present you need to make two instances of SDR Console cooperate with each other. I believe this has been done serial interface.

A few minutes of thought suggest it is technically possible to crank the design of something like SDRConsole around to allow different RX and TX conversion stages (front end/back end respectively.) I am not sure that it is technically feasible without a design contemplating this from the very beginning. It breaks just a whole LOT of normal starting conditions for the design of an existing tool.

I'm afraid you are stuck with the hard way in the first paragraph above.
{^_^}

On 20210813 10:41:21, dietrich@... wrote:
For stability reasond I'd like to run like this. But how?


Re: CSVUserList Browser Question

Max
 

There's so much info in the CSVUB windows I would not have thought it would be very practical even if it could be done?

Max


Re: HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

jdow
 

Still, I am afraid Simon will follow thinking a little like mine. While a tool like SDRC can be designed from the bottom up without presumptions of "same clock" and the like, changing an existing design is probably not in the cards.

{^_^}

On 20210813 11:49:33, dietrich@... wrote:
Out of stock... The TCXOs are  not easy to get. Hackrf ist very stabile...


Re: HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

jdow
 

At present you need to make two instances of SDR Console cooperate with each other. I believe this has been done serial interface.

A few minutes of thought suggest it is technically possible to crank the design of something like SDRConsole around to allow different RX and TX conversion stages (front end/back end respectively.) I am not sure that it is technically feasible without a design contemplating this from the very beginning. It breaks just a whole LOT of normal starting conditions for the design of an existing tool.

I'm afraid you are stuck with the hard way in the first paragraph above.
{^_^}

On 20210813 10:41:21, dietrich@... wrote:
For stability reasond I'd like to run like this. But how?


Re: HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

dietrich@...
 

Out of stock... The TCXOs are  not easy to get. Hackrf ist very stabile...


Re: HackRF as Transmitter and Pluto as receiver?

dietrich@...
 

Same when I want to use 2 HackRFs

3881 - 3900 of 67335