Re: Audio Selection
Conrad, PA5Y
I think that VB Audio is a component but the routing is different. VB Cabe does not support ASIO which is very significant and the routing is much less sophisticated. I use ASIO when possible. Sadly WSJT-X does not use ASIO due to licensing restrictions.
So no it is not merely a graphical overlay.
Regards
Conrad
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of f1hdi via groups.io
Hi Conrad, You lost me, is voice métier potatoo not à graphical overlay mixer of vb audio cable (and physical ones)?
Envoyé de mon Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Orange
-------- Message d'origine --------
De : "Conrad, PA5Y" <g0ruz@...> Date : 30/08/2021 10:25 (GMT+01:00) Objet : Re: [SDR-Radio] Audio Selection
Hello Jean-Marc.
I think that we are not comparing the same thing. Perhaps this is entirely due to overhead and the fact that you are running a virtual machine. Also vanilla VBcable is not the same as Voice Meter Potato. I can assure you that on EME Voice Meter Potato (and probably other weak signal modes) completely out performs VAC.
My findings are contrary to yours.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From:
main@SDR-Radio.groups.io <main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of f1hdi via groups.io
Hi Conrad, I have counter experience regarding vac and vbcable on a 24/7 spyserver clients. The setup with sdr# (connected to the spyserver running an R2 ) -> vac -> wsjt-x (running wspr decode on 2m) is rock stable whereas sdr# (connected to the spyserver running an HF+) -> vac -> wsjt-x (running wspr decode on 2m) is running few days (then sdr# stuck) I tried to substitute vac with vb with poorer results both cases. So this is no evidence on my side which virtual cable is performing the best. I will try a c"client" running sdrcv3 instead of sdr# but the remote system is a windows VM under linux on an i7 small mini pc, so the horse power is minimal. 73 Jean-Marc Le 29/08/2021 à 13:11, Conrad, PA5Y a écrit :
|
|