Re: Data Analyser: CSV file details #sdr-consolev3
OK - I was just wondering.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Post processing I can see forcing the data to provide that level of bandwidth, at least in theory. I am not at all sure you can ask most SDRs or post processors to provide data in a precise 1Hz bandwidth. And even if it is one bin of the FFT (with a power of two sampling clock) that's not a precise 1 Hz noise bandwidth, I don't believe.
Are you looking to record the noise in a 1 Hz bandwidth or are you looking for signal plus noise with a signal that varies level (but not frequency?) The former seems possible with a correction factor. You may have to provide the factor by calibrating the system. The detection mode will make some difference on the readout. Is it a peak or average detector? Is it a true RMS detector? (I^2+Q^2 related.) Is it a rectifier and peak or average detector? All these have something to say for them. I prefer the true RMS approach. But then you have post filtering on the data which can upset calibration, particularly if signal plus noise is involved. I don't know that Simon has released enough information to perform the analysis to get an analytical solution here. I remember some old HP Journal articles (yes, HP old) addressing this. Even the filter shapes will tweak your measurement of noise.
I always worked with known equipment and settings to create known Eb/N0 values. Fortunately I never had to work backwards and calculate Eb/N0 for a really weak signal in noise. That is a thoroughly fugly calculation with just a whole lot of things that can get in the way of accuracy. That is why I believe I'd calibrate the system myself.
And do be aware that you can specify to 1 Hz but, for example, your rtlsdr dongle will never be guaranteed to be accurate to that frequency within 7 Hz plus any clock error present. The synthesizers involved have their own step size which is NOT 1 Hz. That may be the source of another person's problems here; but, the description is not clear enough to know.
As a side issue, where do you get a signal that is stable enough to be seen in the noise of this kind of setup? Over the air signals vary considerably with small variances in pressure, temperature, and humidity even on ground wave paths. Through the ionosphere I suspect it might not be possible depending on the length of observation and the behavior of the Sun.
On 20210421 18:28:44, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
SDRConsole's Data Analyser (in View / Options) does indeed make that claim, resolution bandwidth to better than 0.01Hz under the right settings, when playing back previously recorded SDR files. More samples are used to generate finer scaled FFTs than are used in most SDR playback software. See https://dk8ok.org/2021/01/22/magnificient-fdm-s3-the-millihertz-magnifier/ for example.