Re: Off Topic - Antenna Design Software
Brian Howell
Ahhh okay. Thanks! Yeah, that was what I
was talking about. . . I'll have to study up on that.
Brian Howell
From: Tom
Crosbie G6PZZ [mailto:tom@...]
Sent: Thursday,
September 10, 2020, 5:17 AM
Subject:
[SDR-Radio] Off Topic - Antenna Design Software
Also look up the Gamma Match Brian. It’s how the best match was obtained with the old MET antennas in the 80’s. Mechanically quite easy to do with the driven element connected to the boom electrically. I can help more on describing this but I’m on another mission today.
Tom G6PZZ
From: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io
<main@SDR-Radio.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Brian Howell
Sent: 10 September 2020 10:03 To: main@SDR-Radio.groups.io Subject: Re: [SDR-Radio] Off Topic - Antenna Design Software
Thanks! I will take a look at the group. I'm waiting on the updated version of NanoVNA V2 before I buy one of those, that will help a lot I believe, if I am able to build an antenna. At least I'll be able to measure the impedance and SWR of what I make to see how close it is to what I am wanting. I have no test equipment to speak of when it comes to antennas so whatever I make may inefficient in many ways. I'll have to look into how the driven element is attached to the coax. I've read that two strait rods are around 75 ohms or so but fold them and they are around 300, I remember that from the days of when I was wanting to build mu own TV antenna way back in my teens and twenty's. With 50 ohm I've seen pictures of a dipole with a third short rod attached to one side under one of the dipoles and some with ferrite rings, ect. . I'm just hoping all I need to two dipoles to make it simple.
Thanks, Brian Howell
From: jdow [mailto:jdow@...] Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020, 8:08 PM Subject: [SDR-Radio] Off Topic - Antenna Design Software
The [MMANA-GAL] groups.io list MIGHT be
of interest. On 20200909 16:35:34, Brian Howell wrote:
|
|